소장자료
LDR | 03877cam a2200000 a | ||
001 | 0100552675▲ | ||
005 | 20220511154219▲ | ||
007 | ta ▲ | ||
008 | 200810s2021 nyu b 001 0 eng c▲ | ||
010 | ▼a 2020036339▲ | ||
020 | ▼a9780197554685 (hbk.)▲ | ||
020 | ▼z9780197554708▲ | ||
020 | ▼z9780197554692▲ | ||
020 | ▼z9780197554715▲ | ||
035 | ▼a(KERIS)REF000019369463▲ | ||
040 | ▼aDLC▼beng▼cDLC▼d221016▲ | ||
042 | ▼apcc▲ | ||
043 | ▼an-us---▲ | ||
050 | 0 | 0 | ▼aKF9640▼b.B69 2021▲ |
082 | 0 | 4 | ▼a345.73/05042▼223▲ |
084 | ▼a345.05042 ▼2부산대 동양관계항목전개표▲ | ||
090 | ▼a345.05042▼bB789p▲ | ||
100 | 1 | ▼aBoyd, Christina L.▲ | |
245 | 1 | 4 | ▼aThe politics of federal prosecution /▼cChristina L. Boyd, Michael J. Nelson, Ian Ostrander, and Ethan D. Boldt.▲ |
260 | ▼aNew York, NY :▼bOxford University Press,▼c[2021]▲ | ||
300 | ▼aviii, 240 p. ;▼c25 cm▲ | ||
504 | ▼aIncludes bibliographical references and index.▲ | ||
505 | 0 | ▼aFederal prosecution yesterday and today -- Confirming U.S. attorneys -- Departures & removals -- Theorizing political responsiveness in prosecutorial decision making -- To prosecute or not : prosecutors as agenda setters -- The charging & bargaining decisions -- Criminal asset forfeiture as a political tool.▲ | |
520 | ▼a"In February 2016, while testifying in a House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a Barack Obama appointee, promised that her department would act with independence in investigating Hillary Clinton's usage of a personal email server during her tenure as Secretary of State. During that hearing, Congressman John Carter (R-TX) asked Lynch: If the FBI makes the case that Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information and put America's security at risk, will you prosecute the case? . . .[P]lease look the American people in the eye and tell us what your position is as you are the chief prosecutor of the United States. In response to this questioning, Lynch asserted that: [The matter] is being handled by . . . independent attorneys in the Department of Justice. They follow the evidence, they look at the law and they'll make a recommendation to me when the time is appropriate. . .This will be conducted as every other case. We will review all the facts and all the evidence and come to an independent conclusion as how to best handle it. And I am also aware of no efforts to undermine our review or investigation into this matter at all (Goldman 2016). Despite strong claims of prosecutorial independence, many Republicans complained that a Department of Justice run by Obama appointees could not impartially pass legal judgment on the Hillary Clintonemails matter. A June 27, 2016 meeting between Lynch and former U.S. President Bill Clinton would not help matters. The two privately talked for approximately 20 minutes on a plane sitting on the Phoenix Sky Harbor airport tarmac in a meeting described as unplanned and "primarily social." Despite the meeting's claimed innocuous content, it "caused a cascading political storm" for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and "provided fodder for Republicans who have accused the Justice Department of bias in its inquiry into Secretary Clinton's use of a private email server at the State Department" (Chozick 2016). Even Democrats expressed concerns about the meeting Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) remarked that "I do think that this meeting sends the wrong signal . . . I think she should have steered clear, even of a brief, casual social meeting with the former president"--▼cProvided by publisher.▲ | ||
650 | 0 | ▼aProsecution▼zUnited States.▲ | |
650 | 0 | ▼aPublic prosecutors▼zUnited States.▲ | |
650 | 0 | ▼aProsecution▼xPolitical aspects▼zUnited States▲ | |
700 | 1 | ▼aNelson, Michael J.,▼d1986-▲ | |
700 | 1 | ▼aOstrander, Ian.▲ | |
700 | 1 | ▼aBoldt, Ethan D.▲ |
The politics of federal prosecution
자료유형
국외단행본
서명/책임사항
The politics of federal prosecution / Christina L. Boyd, Michael J. Nelson, Ian Ostrander, and Ethan D. Boldt.
발행사항
New York, NY : Oxford University Press , [2021]
형태사항
viii, 240 p. ; 25 cm
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references and index.
내용주기
Federal prosecution yesterday and today -- Confirming U.S. attorneys -- Departures & removals -- Theorizing political responsiveness in prosecutorial decision making -- To prosecute or not : prosecutors as agenda setters -- The charging & bargaining decisions -- Criminal asset forfeiture as a political tool.
요약주기
"In February 2016, while testifying in a House Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch, a Barack Obama appointee, promised that her department would act with independence in investigating Hillary Clinton's usage of a personal email server during her tenure as Secretary of State. During that hearing, Congressman John Carter (R-TX) asked Lynch: If the FBI makes the case that Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information and put America's security at risk, will you prosecute the case? . . .[P]lease look the American people in the eye and tell us what your position is as you are the chief prosecutor of the United States. In response to this questioning, Lynch asserted that: [The matter] is being handled by . . . independent attorneys in the Department of Justice. They follow the evidence, they look at the law and they'll make a recommendation to me when the time is appropriate. . .This will be conducted as every other case. We will review all the facts and all the evidence and come to an independent conclusion as how to best handle it. And I am also aware of no efforts to undermine our review or investigation into this matter at all (Goldman 2016). Despite strong claims of prosecutorial independence, many Republicans complained that a Department of Justice run by Obama appointees could not impartially pass legal judgment on the Hillary Clintonemails matter. A June 27, 2016 meeting between Lynch and former U.S. President Bill Clinton would not help matters. The two privately talked for approximately 20 minutes on a plane sitting on the Phoenix Sky Harbor airport tarmac in a meeting described as unplanned and "primarily social." Despite the meeting's claimed innocuous content, it "caused a cascading political storm" for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and "provided fodder for Republicans who have accused the Justice Department of bias in its inquiry into Secretary Clinton's use of a private email server at the State Department" (Chozick 2016). Even Democrats expressed concerns about the meeting Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) remarked that "I do think that this meeting sends the wrong signal . . . I think she should have steered clear, even of a brief, casual social meeting with the former president"-- Provided by publisher.
주제
ISBN
9780197554685 (hbk.)
청구기호
345.05042 B789p
소장정보
예도서예약
서서가에없는책 신고
보보존서고신청
캠캠퍼스대출
우우선정리신청
배자료배달신청
문문자발송
출청구기호출력
학소장학술지 원문서비스
등록번호 | 청구기호 | 소장처 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 서비스 |
---|
북토크
자유롭게 책을 읽고
느낀점을 적어주세요
글쓰기
느낀점을 적어주세요
청구기호 브라우징
관련 인기대출 도서