소장자료
LDR | 04473nam 2200505 4500 | ||
001 | 0100801816▲ | ||
005 | 20240322165935▲ | ||
006 | m o d ▲ | ||
007 | cr#unu||||||||▲ | ||
008 | 240116s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d▲ | ||
020 | ▼a9798379776299▲ | ||
035 | ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30311655▲ | ||
040 | ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ▲ | ||
082 | 0 | ▼a301.1▲ | |
100 | 1 | ▼aMogami, Mao.▲ | |
245 | 1 | 0 | ▼aThe Oppression Lens: Should a History of Oppression and Power Dynamics Between Groups Matter When Making Current-Day Social Judgments?▼h[electronic resource]▲ |
260 | ▼a[S.l.]: ▼bNew York University. ▼c2023▲ | ||
260 | 1 | ▼aAnn Arbor : ▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023▲ | |
300 | ▼a1 online resource(235 p.)▲ | ||
500 | ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.▲ | ||
500 | ▼aAdvisor: Knowles, Eric D.▲ | ||
502 | 1 | ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.▲ | |
506 | ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.▲ | ||
520 | ▼aHow do we judge whether individuals are allowed to engage in intergroup discrimination in their choice of housemates, friends, or organizations? Why do some people fervently support affirmative action whereas others oppose it? I propose that one way in which we can understand these disagreements is through the prism of the Oppression Lens. I define the Oppression Lens as the extent to which people consider histories of oppression and power dynamics between social groups (e.g., nationalities, genders, races, sexual orientations) when making current-day social judgments. Simply put, the Oppression Lens perspective is an analytical perspective that interprets present-day contentious intergroup relations issues as arising from different levels of consideration given to historical contexts. Those high on the Oppression Lens see the world as made and remade through the history of social and political power dynamics. For them, it is important to apply flexible standards based on the understanding that different groups (e.g., straight vs. queer individuals) along a social dimension (e.g., sexual orientation) possess different historical experiences. On the other hand, those low on the Oppression Lens do not appreciate that social groups are characterized by differential power rooted in history; rather, they see social groups as existing in the present apart from history. In this dissertation, I develop the Oppression Lens perspective drawing on intergroup relations literatures in social psychology (colorblindness, historical perspectives), and critical race theory in legal studies (Chapter 1). I highlight that the Oppression Lens perspective can complement scholarship on traditional forms of prejudice and discrimination. Then, I construct a self-report measure-the Endorsement of the Oppression Lens (EOL) scale-to capture individual differences in the Oppression Lens construct (Chapter 2). I then show that the Oppression Lens measured by EOL can predict people's judgments about the permissibility of criticism, differential judgments of the same actions carried out by actors belonging to powerful vs. marginalized groups, and differential prejudices toward social groups of different perceived power and historical victimization (Chapter 3). I seek to understand the extreme ends of the Oppression Lens by interviewing those extremely low and high on the Oppression Lens (Chapter 4). Lastly, I show that a short, one-time intervention is not successful in increasing people's endorsement of the Oppression Lens (Chapter 5). To conclude, I discuss the strengths, limitations, and implications of the Oppression Lens perspective learned through the studies and discuss future directions of the research program (Chapter 6).▲ | ||
590 | ▼aSchool code: 0146.▲ | ||
650 | 4 | ▼aSocial psychology.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aHistory.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aSocial research.▲ | |
653 | ▼aCRT▲ | ||
653 | ▼aIntergroup relations▲ | ||
653 | ▼aOppression Lens▲ | ||
653 | ▼aEOL▲ | ||
653 | ▼aSocial groups▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0451▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0344▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0578▲ | ||
710 | 2 | 0 | ▼aNew York University.▼bPsychology.▲ |
773 | 0 | ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-01A.▲ | |
773 | ▼tDissertation Abstract International▲ | ||
790 | ▼a0146▲ | ||
791 | ▼aPh.D.▲ | ||
792 | ▼a2023▲ | ||
793 | ▼aEnglish▲ | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | ▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16931427▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.▲ |
![](https://lib.pusan.ac.kr/wp-content/themes/pnul2022/assets/images/default/default_w_279X393.png)
The Oppression Lens: Should a History of Oppression and Power Dynamics Between Groups Matter When Making Current-Day Social Judgments?[electronic resource]
자료유형
국외eBook
서명/책임사항
The Oppression Lens: Should a History of Oppression and Power Dynamics Between Groups Matter When Making Current-Day Social Judgments? [electronic resource]
개인저자
발행사항
[S.l.] : New York University. 2023 Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses , 2023
형태사항
1 online resource(235 p.)
일반주기
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: A.
Advisor: Knowles, Eric D.
Advisor: Knowles, Eric D.
학위논문주기
Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.
요약주기
How do we judge whether individuals are allowed to engage in intergroup discrimination in their choice of housemates, friends, or organizations? Why do some people fervently support affirmative action whereas others oppose it? I propose that one way in which we can understand these disagreements is through the prism of the Oppression Lens. I define the Oppression Lens as the extent to which people consider histories of oppression and power dynamics between social groups (e.g., nationalities, genders, races, sexual orientations) when making current-day social judgments. Simply put, the Oppression Lens perspective is an analytical perspective that interprets present-day contentious intergroup relations issues as arising from different levels of consideration given to historical contexts. Those high on the Oppression Lens see the world as made and remade through the history of social and political power dynamics. For them, it is important to apply flexible standards based on the understanding that different groups (e.g., straight vs. queer individuals) along a social dimension (e.g., sexual orientation) possess different historical experiences. On the other hand, those low on the Oppression Lens do not appreciate that social groups are characterized by differential power rooted in history; rather, they see social groups as existing in the present apart from history. In this dissertation, I develop the Oppression Lens perspective drawing on intergroup relations literatures in social psychology (colorblindness, historical perspectives), and critical race theory in legal studies (Chapter 1). I highlight that the Oppression Lens perspective can complement scholarship on traditional forms of prejudice and discrimination. Then, I construct a self-report measure-the Endorsement of the Oppression Lens (EOL) scale-to capture individual differences in the Oppression Lens construct (Chapter 2). I then show that the Oppression Lens measured by EOL can predict people's judgments about the permissibility of criticism, differential judgments of the same actions carried out by actors belonging to powerful vs. marginalized groups, and differential prejudices toward social groups of different perceived power and historical victimization (Chapter 3). I seek to understand the extreme ends of the Oppression Lens by interviewing those extremely low and high on the Oppression Lens (Chapter 4). Lastly, I show that a short, one-time intervention is not successful in increasing people's endorsement of the Oppression Lens (Chapter 5). To conclude, I discuss the strengths, limitations, and implications of the Oppression Lens perspective learned through the studies and discuss future directions of the research program (Chapter 6).
ISBN
9798379776299
관련 인기대출 도서