학술논문


EBSCO Discovery Service
발행년
-
(예 : 2010-2015)
전자자료 공정이용 안내

우리 대학 도서관에서 구독·제공하는 모든 전자자료(데이터베이스, 전자저널, 전자책 등)는 국내외 저작권법과 출판사와의 라이선스 계약에 따라 엄격하게 보호를 받고 있습니다.
전자자료의 비정상적 이용은 출판사로부터의 경고, 서비스 차단, 손해배상 청구 등 학교 전체에 심각한 불이익을 초래할 수 있으므로, 아래의 공정이용 지침을 반드시 준수해 주시기 바랍니다.

공정이용 지침
  • 전자자료는 개인의 학습·교육·연구 목적의 비영리적 사용에 한하여 이용할 수 있습니다.
  • 합리적인 수준의 다운로드 및 출력만 허용됩니다. (일반적으로 동일 PC에서 동일 출판사의 논문을 1일 30건 이하 다운로드할 것을 권장하며, 출판사별 기준에 따라 다를 수 있습니다.)
  • 출판사에서 제공한 논문의 URL을 수업 관련 웹사이트에 게재할 수 있으나, 출판사 원문 파일 자체를 복제·배포해서는 안 됩니다.
  • 본인의 ID/PW를 타인에게 제공하지 말고, 도용되지 않도록 철저히 관리해 주시기 바랍니다.
불공정 이용 사례
  • 전자적·기계적 수단(다운로딩 프로그램, 웹 크롤러, 로봇, 매크로, RPA 등)을 이용한 대량 다운로드
  • 동일 컴퓨터 또는 동일 IP에서 단시간 내 다수의 원문을 집중적으로 다운로드하거나, 전권(whole issue) 다운로드
  • 저장·출력한 자료를 타인에게 배포하거나 개인 블로그·웹하드 등에 업로드
  • 상업적·영리적 목적으로 자료를 전송·복제·활용
  • ID/PW를 타인에게 양도하거나 타인 계정을 도용하여 이용
  • EndNote, Mendeley 등 서지관리 프로그램의 Find Full Text 기능을 이용한 대량 다운로드
  • 출판사 콘텐츠를 생성형 AI 시스템에서 활용하는 행위(업로드, 개발, 학습, 프로그래밍, 개선 또는 강화 등)
위반 시 제재
  • 출판사에 의한 해당 IP 또는 기관 전체 접속 차단
  • 출판사 배상 요구 시 위반자 개인이 배상 책임 부담
'학술논문' 에서 검색결과 129,389건 | 목록 1~20
Academic Journal
自然科学进展(英文版) / PROGRESS IN NATURAL SCIENCE. 13(3):173-178
Academic Journal
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL; JAN 24 2026, 14p.
Academic Journal
Academic Medicine. Aug 01, 2021 96(8):1079-1080
Academic Journal
Mersin University Journal of Linguistics & Literature / Mersin Üniversitesi Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi. 2024, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
Academic Journal
Proceedings in Radiochemistry: A Supplement to Radiochimica Acta. 1(1):287-291
Syllable formation and syllable division in english: 50 5. .ربکهذٌگ َلحار ٍرّد ،یًبثز یبُ صُّژپ // یسربف ىبثز لبعفا حطس رد یتفبث ییبٌعه نُ َلئسه َث یتخبٌض یدرکیّر ٍربوض ،مّد 2 ىبتسهز ّ سییبپ ، 1330 ظ . 125 - 115 6. ٍرّد ،یًبثز یبُربتسج // یسربف ىبثز رد تکره یبُ لعف ةّبٌت ّ ٌَیهز یسبطًبٌعه .یرفص یلع 2 ٍربوض ، 2 ّ ربِث ، ىبتسثبت 1332 ظ . 39 - 91 7. لبس ،یتخبٌض مْلع یبُ ٍزبت // یسربف یبٌعهذٌچ لعف کی َث یتخبٌض یدرکیّر .یفیرض لایل 11 ٍربوض ، 4 ، 1399 ظ ، 11 – 1 . 8. وح ٍربوض ،مْس ّ تسیث ٍرّد .یسربف تبیثدا ّ ىبثز شزْهآ ذضر // لعف یبٌعه رییغت رد رثؤه رصبٌع .یعیثر ذی 2 ، ىبتسهز 1399 ظ ، 50 - 49 9. لعف ییبٌعه یبضف .مبفلگ ىلاسرا « ىذض » ٍرّد .یقیجطت تبیثدا ّ ىبثز یبُ صُّژپ // یتخبٌض شرگً :یسربف ىبثز رد 2 ٍربوض ، 4 ىبتسهز ، 1330 . SYLLABLE FORMATION AND SYLLABLE DIVISION IN ENGLISH Kurbanbaev Dj.A. Foreign Languages Faculty, KSU named after Berdakh, Nukus, Uzbekistan Jumaniyazova Z.K. Master student, KSU named after Berdakh, Nukus, Uzbekistan As stated above the syllabic structure, as a component of the phonetic system, consists of syllable formation and syllable division which are in close relationship to each other. All theories of the syllable have more often attempted to explain the syllable formation, but the problem of the division has not been thoroughly investigated, which is both theoretically and practically important in language description. Nevertheless, it is possible to formulate some general rules of syllable formation and syllable division in English [1: 103]. In English a syllable is formed by a vowel (monophthong or diphthong) alone or in combination with one or more consonants Example: ore [o:], more [mә:], at [әt], [æt], [әt] cap [kæp], consideration [‗kәnsidә-rei-∫n] etc. In the English words bottle [bәt-l], batten [bæt-n], rhythm [rið:-m] the final sonorants lateral [n] and nasal [m], [n] and sometimes [ŋ] may form separate syllables [4: 54]. But the English sonorants [w], [j], [r] cannot form syllables. Thus, we can distinguish syllabic [m, n, l] and non-syllabic [r, j, w] sonorants. In English a syllable formation and syllable divisions depend on many factors among which the phonotactic rules, which – determine the combination of phonemes or clusters and the nature of adjoining them, are regarded very important. The permissible clusters of consonants are, in part, conditioned by historical but chiefly by physiological factors. These include the following: 1) whether two phonemes which might adjoin in the same-cluster have the same articulator; 2) whether they have the same type of articulation; 3) whether they are both voiced or voiceless; 4) whether the have the same or varying conditions of structure; 5) whether especially in phonemes of the same articulation type, one is slightly more prominent than the other. Thus [r], an apical consonant, is never preceded by [s], also apical stops do not combine initially with stops, etc. Syllabic consonants occur when a syllable ends in [t], [d] or [n] and the next syllable is unstressed and contains [l], [n] or [m]. If the other consonant clusters except c+[l], [n], [m] occur at the end of words they are regarded to be non-syllabic. This conditions the existence of the contrast ―no syllable vs. a syllable‖. Example; cattle [kæt-l] – cats [kæts], battle [bæt-l] – bats [bæts], muttony [mΛt-n] etc. thus, the syllable formation and syllable division in English have a phonological function. From the articulatory point of view the clusters [t], [d]+[l], [n] are formed with the tip of the tongue touching the tooth ridge, i.e. they have the similar type of articulation. Clifford H., Prator Jr. points out two other cases of the occurrence of syllabic-consonants in rapid conversational speech where stops and continuants have the same points of articulation: 1) between [p] or [b] and [m] as stop‘em [stopthem] [st p-m]; 2) between [k] or [g] and [n], as in I can go [aikŋgәv]. The English sonorants are not syllabic when they fellow vowels. Ex.Sweden [swidәn], heighten [haitәn], [lantern], [læntәn]; The following final clusters, in which the second member constitutes sonorants [m], [n] and [i] may form separate syllable: [-tm], [:m], [sm], [zm], [-lm]; botton [b t-m], rhythm [ri:-m], blossom [bl sm], film [film]; [p, b, t, d, k, g, dз, f, v, θ, s, z, ∫, l]+[n]; open [әu-pn], ribbon [ri-bn], eaten [i:-th], garden [ga:-dn], darken [da:-kn], dragen [drae-gn], region [ri-dзn], often [-fn], seven [se-vn], earthen [з:θn], lesson [le-sn], season [si:-zn]; [p, b, t, d, k, t∫, dз, v, f, s, z]+[l]; people [pi:pl], table [tei-bl], settle [se-tl], middle [mid-l], cycle [sai-k], bugle [bi:-gl], racial [rei-∫l], rifle [rai-fl], cudgel [kΛdзl], civil [si-vl], castle [ka:-sl], drissle [dri-zl], special [spei-∫l] [2: 11]. In some cases two syllabic consonants may occur in the derivatives of English words, for example; national [næ∫nl], regionally [ridзnli] etc. 51 Acoustically the syllabic feature of [n] and [l] may be characterized by relative duration and intensity, which are interpreted as their prosodic properties. As to the distribution of the non-syllabic consonants, it is conditioned by the occurrence of [ә] or [i] sounds between the two elements of the clusters cited above, whereas their omission is necessary for the formation of syllables. None of the above clusters exist in final position of Karakalpak words. On the contrary, in such Karakalpak word forms as қалды ―stayed‖, саған ―for you‖, барды ―went‖ etc. combinations of [л, и, н, р]+с appear which are divided-into two syllables [3: 30-39]. The consonants [л, р, й, в, н, м, п] cannot form syllables in Karakalpak isolately. When they occur before vowels, they signal the existence of a syllable division before of after them example; бала [ба-ла] ―a child‖, қә-не [қә-не] ―where‖, барған [бар-ған] ―gone‖, қарда [қар-да] ―on the snow‖, уйге [уй-ге] ―to the house‖, суўда [суў-да] ―in the water‖, кӛрдинбе [кӛр-дин-бе] ―Have you seen‖ etc. All Karakalpak vowels are freely used before or after consonants and it is an important factor of syllable division and none-syllabic character of the consonants [л, м, н]. Thanks to this difference inert may be cases of syllabic interference. The syllable division may depend on the free-and checked character of English vowels. All the long monophthongs, two diphthongoids and diphthongs of English are regarded free, as they occur both in open and closed syllables, while all the checked vowels occur in a closed syllable. The free vowels may be separated from the word-final syllabic sonorants, when the latter form separate syllable with the preceding consonants. For example; cable [kei-bl], people [pi:-pl], garden [ga:-dn]. When we checked the vowels they were separated form other vowel sounds by only one consonant sound, the exact determination of the syllabic boundary was a moot point. Theoretically this means that the syllable division can only be either within or after the intervocalic consonant and never before it, since the vowel is checked by it, and the syllable is closed [2: 247]. Example; matter [mætә], sitter [sitә], manner [mænә], lesser [lesә] etc. Though after stressed checked vowels of such words as middle, sunny, flannel, the syllable division regularly occurs before the consonants: [‗midl], [sΛni], [flæ-nl]. In many English words the syllable division automatically coincides with the morphemic boundary. Example, take over [teik‘auvә], day time [‗deitaim], overdressed [‗әuvәdrest]. Such a coincidence of syllabic and morphemic boundaries often occurs in English complex and compound words. G.P.Torsuyev points out that there are many cases of the variation of phonemic structure of English words, winch are conditioned by different types of assimilation and reduction. For example; [mpt]→[mt:] attempt, [kәn]→[kn]: bacon, [nt∫]→[n∫]: bencher, open [әup(ә)n], total [taut(ә)l], etc. G.P.Torsyev states that the articulatory transition is constant in syllable boundary but all other features of a syllable may be varied by the influence of different phonetic factors. [5: 90-95]. There are also cases when syllable boundary is within the consonant sound in an intervocalic position or within the C+sonorant cluster in word-medial position. Example; ever [ev-vә], difficult [dif-fi-k(ә)lt], sunny [sΛn-ni], middling [midl-liŋ]. A similar case may be noticed in some Karakalpak words: ала [а-ла], ―black‖. Incidency, such cases appear as the result of metanalysis of syllables into two syllables which often occur in rapid pronunciation, but, they are theoretically doubtful. As a conclusion, we may say that the syllabic structure of English is very complex and we have analyzed some of its general problems of theoretical importance. Also we tried to reveal the comparison of some elements of in English and Karakalpak, which requires to investigate thoroughly. REFERENCES: 1. Connor D.O. and Trim J.L.M. Vowel. Consonant and Syllable Phonological Definition. ―Word‖. Vol-9. 1953 p.103. 2. Vasilyev V.A. et al. English Phonetics. M. 2016. p. 11 3. Вахек И. Несколько замечаний о роли слогообразующий функции при фонологическом анализе. В кн. «Человек и язык». Москва. 1970, стр. 54 4. Багдасарян С.А. О фонетический природе сонантной слоговости. Сборник научных трудов. Москва. 1977. стр.30-39. 5. Торсуев Р.П. Константность и вариантность в фонетической системе. М., Изд. «Наука», 1977. стр. 90-95. https://knigogid.ru/books/29083-teoreticheskaya-fonetika-sovremennogo-angliyskogo-yazyka-uchebnik-a-theoretical-course-of-english-phonetics
Academic Journal
Ренессанс в парадигме новаций образования и технологий в XXI веке. :51-52
Academic Journal
In: Turkish Journal of History. (Turkish Journal of History, 7 July 2023, (80):115-147)
검색 결과 제한하기
제한된 항목
[검색어] Ri, M
발행연도 제한
-
학술DB(Database Provider)
저널명(출판물, Title)
출판사(Publisher)
자료유형(Source Type)
주제어
언어