부산대학교 도서관

The aim of this study was to determine the current approach of EBV-driven post-transplant complications in context of monitoring, diagnosis, prevalence and treatment in EBMT transplant centers. Routine serology testing in patient and donor before HCT is performed in 95.5% centers. Pretransplant EBV-DNA is routinely tested in all patients in 32.7% centers. Monitoring for EBV infection is feasible in 98.2% centers: including 66.7% centers using standardized PCR. Post-HCT regular monitoring is performed in all patients in 80.5% centers. Anti-EBV prophylaxis with rituximab is used in 12.4% centers. Frequency of csEBV-DNA-emia was 7.4% (adults: 6.2%, children: 12.6%). The PCR threshold used to start preemptive treatment was differentiated among centers. Frequency of EBV-PTLD was 1.6% (adults: 1.3%; children: 3.5%). First-line therapy of EBV-driven complications was rituximab and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. The rate of failure of first-line preemptive treatment was 12.0%. EBV-specific viral-specific T-lymphocytes were available in 46.0% centers. A number of new experimental therapies were given in 28 patients with resistant/refractory PTLD. In conclusion, the prevalence of EBV-DNA-emia and EBV-PTLD over the period 2020–2021 decreased in comparison to historical data. New trends (routine pretransplant screening for EBV-DNA, wider access to VST, new experimental therapies) are being observed in management of EBV infection after allo-HCT.