학술논문
Reclaiming Agency in Care Decisions and Barriers From the Perspectives of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury and Their Family Members.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Ownsworth T; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Bates A; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Watter K; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Morgan C; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Bell R; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Griffin J; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Turner B; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Kennedy A; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Kendall M; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Adams B; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Gibson E; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Hakala T; Division of Rehabilitation, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.; Mitchell J; The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Source
Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9815926 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1369-7625 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13696513 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Expect Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: The ability to self-advocate or have a say in one's care is integral to personalised care after acquired brain injury (ABI). This study aimed to understand what constitutes self-advocacy and associated barriers and facilitators throughout hospital transitions and into the community.
Method: Qualitative methodology was employed with semistructured interviews conducted with 12 people with ABI and 13 family members. Interviews were conducted at predischarge (in-person or via telephone) and 4 months postdischarge (via telephone) from the brain injury rehabilitation unit of a tertiary hospital. Data were thematically analysed using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach.
Results: Self-advocacy reflects the process of reclaiming agency or people's efforts to exert influence over care decisions after ABI. Agency varies along a continuum, often beginning with impaired processing of the self or environment (loss of agency) before individuals start to understand and question their care (emerging agency) and ultimately plan and direct their ongoing and future care (striving for agency). This process may vary across individuals and contexts. Barriers to self-advocacy for individuals with ABI include neurocognitive deficits that limit capacity and desire for control over decisions, unfamiliar and highly structured environments and lack of family support. Facilitators include neurocognitive recovery, growing desire to self-advocate and scaffolded support from family and clinicians.
Conclusion: Self-advocacy after ABI entails a process of reclaiming agency whereby individuals seek to understand, question and direct their ongoing care. This is facilitated by neurocognitive recovery, growing capacity and desire and scaffolded supports. Research evaluating approaches for embedding self-advocacy skills early in brain injury rehabilitation is recommended.
Patient or Public Contribution: Two caregivers with lived experience of supporting a family member with ABI were involved in the design and conduct of this study and contributed to and provided feedback on the manuscript.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Method: Qualitative methodology was employed with semistructured interviews conducted with 12 people with ABI and 13 family members. Interviews were conducted at predischarge (in-person or via telephone) and 4 months postdischarge (via telephone) from the brain injury rehabilitation unit of a tertiary hospital. Data were thematically analysed using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach.
Results: Self-advocacy reflects the process of reclaiming agency or people's efforts to exert influence over care decisions after ABI. Agency varies along a continuum, often beginning with impaired processing of the self or environment (loss of agency) before individuals start to understand and question their care (emerging agency) and ultimately plan and direct their ongoing and future care (striving for agency). This process may vary across individuals and contexts. Barriers to self-advocacy for individuals with ABI include neurocognitive deficits that limit capacity and desire for control over decisions, unfamiliar and highly structured environments and lack of family support. Facilitators include neurocognitive recovery, growing desire to self-advocate and scaffolded support from family and clinicians.
Conclusion: Self-advocacy after ABI entails a process of reclaiming agency whereby individuals seek to understand, question and direct their ongoing care. This is facilitated by neurocognitive recovery, growing capacity and desire and scaffolded supports. Research evaluating approaches for embedding self-advocacy skills early in brain injury rehabilitation is recommended.
Patient or Public Contribution: Two caregivers with lived experience of supporting a family member with ABI were involved in the design and conduct of this study and contributed to and provided feedback on the manuscript.
(© 2024 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)