학술논문
Sagittal Full-Spine vs. Sectional Cervical Lateral Radiographs: Are the Measurements of Cervical Alignment Interchangeable?
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Haas JW; CBP NonProfit, Inc., Eagle, ID 83616, USA.; Oakley PA; Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.; Betz JW; CBP NonProfit, Inc., Eagle, ID 83616, USA.; Private Practice, Boise, ID 83709, USA.; Miller JE; CBP NonProfit, Inc., Eagle, ID 83616, USA.; Private Practice, Lakewood, CO 80226, USA.; Jaeger JO; CBP NonProfit, Inc., Eagle, ID 83616, USA.; Community Based Internship Program, Associate Faculty, Southern California University of Health Sciences, Whittier, CA 90604, USA.; Moustafa IM; Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.; Neuromusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Group, RIMHS-Research Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates.; Harrison DE; CBP NonProfit, Inc., Eagle, ID 83616, USA.
Source
Publisher: MDPI AG Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101606588 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2077-0383 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20770383 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Clin Med Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
2077-0383
Abstract
(1) Background: This study assessed the relationship between cervical spine parameters taken on standing full-spine lateral radiographic images compared to sectional lateral cervical radiographs. (2) Methods: Full-spine (FS) and sectional lateral cervical (LC) radiographs from four spine treatment facilities across the USA retrospectively provided data collected on 220 persons to assess the comparison of three sagittal cervical radiographic measurements between the two views. The measures included cervical lordosis using the absolute rotation angle from C2-C7, sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7, and atlas plane angle to horizontal. Linear correlation and R 2 models were used for statistical comparison of the measures for the two views. (3) Results: The mean values of the three measurements were statistically different from each other: C2-C7 translation (FS = 19.84 ± 11.98 vs. LC = 21.18 ± 11.8), C2-C7 lordosis (FS = -15.3 ± 14.63 vs. LC = -18.32 ± 13.16), and atlas plane (FS = -19.99 ± 8.88 vs. LC = -22.56 ± 8.93), where all values were p < 0.001. Weak-to-moderate-to-strong correlations existed between the full-spine and sectional lateral cervical radiographic variables. The R 2 values varied based on the measurement were R 2 = 0.768 ( p < 0.001) for sagittal cervical translation of C2-C7 (strong), R 2 = 0.613 ( p < 0.001) for the absolute rotation angle C2-C7 (moderate), and R 2 = 0.406 ( p < 0.001) for the atlas plane line (weak). Though a linear correlation was identified, there were consistent intra-person differences between the measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views, where the full-spine view consistently underestimated the magnitude of the variables. (4) Conclusion: Key sagittal cervical radiographic measurements on the full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views show striking intra-person differences. The findings of this study confirm that full spine versus sectional lateral cervical radiographic views provide different biomechanical magnitudes of cervical sagittal alignment, and caution should be exercised by health care providers as these are not interchangeable. We recommend the LC view for measurement of cervical sagittal alignment variables.