학술논문

Assessment of flomoxef combined with amikacin in a hollow-fibre infection model for the treatment of neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income healthcare settings.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC). Dec2022, Vol. 77 Issue 12, p3349-3357. 9p.
Subject
*ANTIBIOTICS
*MICROBIAL sensitivity tests
*RESEARCH funding
*MEDICAL care
*CLINICAL trials
*AMIKACIN
*CEPHALOSPORINS
*PHARMACODYNAMICS
Language
ISSN
0305-7453
Abstract
Background: Annual mortality from neonatal sepsis is an estimated 430 000-680 000 infants globally, most of which occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The WHO currently recommends a narrow-spectrum β-lactam (e.g. ampicillin) and gentamicin as first-line empirical therapy. However, available epidemiological data demonstrate high rates of resistance to both agents. Alternative empirical regimens are needed. Flomoxef and amikacin are two off-patent antibiotics with potential for use in this setting.Objectives: To assess the pharmacodynamics of flomoxef and amikacin in combination.Methods: The pharmacodynamic interaction of flomoxef and amikacin was assessed in chequerboard assays and a 16-arm dose-ranged hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) experiment. The combination was further assessed in HFIM experiments mimicking neonatal plasma exposures of clinically relevant doses of both drugs against five Enterobacterales isolates with a range of flomoxef/amikacin MICs.Results: Flomoxef and amikacin in combination were synergistic in bacterial killing in both assays and prevention of emergence of amikacin resistance in the HFIM. In the HFIM assessing neonatal-like drug exposures, the combination killed 3/5 strains to sterility, (including 2/5 that monotherapy with either drug failed to kill) and failed to kill the 2/5 strains with flomoxef MICs of 32 mg/L.Conclusions: We conclude that the combination of flomoxef and amikacin is synergistic and is a potentially clinically effective regimen for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis in LMIC settings and is therefore suitable for further assessment in a clinical trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]