학술논문

No socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer survival within a randomised clinical trial.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
British Journal of Cancer. 12/2/2008, Vol. 99 Issue 11, p1923-1928. 6p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject
*COLON cancer patients
*CANCER patients -- Social conditions
*SOCIAL factors
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*MULTIPLE imputation (Statistics)
*RESEARCH
*RESEARCH methodology
*ANTINEOPLASTIC agents
*EVALUATION research
*MEDICAL cooperation
*COLORECTAL cancer
*SOCIOECONOMIC factors
*FLUOROURACIL
*COMPARATIVE studies
*RESEARCH funding
*COMBINED modality therapy
*RADIOTHERAPY
DIGESTIVE organ surgery
Language
ISSN
0007-0920
Abstract
There is strong evidence that colorectal cancer survival differs between socioeconomic groups. We analysed data on 2481 patients diagnosed during 1989-1997 and recruited to a randomised controlled clinical trial (AXIS, ISRCTN32414363) of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for colorectal cancer. Crude and relative survival at 1 and 5 years was estimated in five categories of socioeconomic deprivation. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data on tumour stage. A multivariable fractional polynomial model was fitted to estimate the excess hazard of death in each deprivation category, adjusting for the confounding effects of age, stage, cancer site (colon, rectum) and sex, using generalised linear models. Relative survival in the trial patients was higher than in the general population of England and Wales. The socioeconomic gradient in survival was much smaller than that seen for colorectal cancer patients in the general population, both at 1 year -3.2% (95% CI -7.3 to 1.0%, P=0.14) and at 5 years -1.7% (95% CI -8.3 to 4.9%, P=0.61). Given equal treatment, colorectal cancer survival in England and Wales does not appear to depend on socioeconomic status, suggesting that the socioeconomic gradient in survival in the general population could well be due to health-care system factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]