학술논문
National ICU Registries as Enablers of Clinical Research and Quality Improvement.
Document Type
Article
Author
Salluh, Jorge I. F.; Quintairos, Amanda; Dongelmans, Dave A.; Aryal, Diptesh; Bagshaw, Sean; Beane, Abigail; Burghi, Gaston; López, Maria del Pilar Arias; Finazzi, Stefano; Guidet, Bertrand; Hashimoto, Satoru; Ichihara, Nao; Litton, Edward; Lone, Nazir I.; Pari, Vrindha; Sendagire, Cornelius; Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi; Haniffa, Rashan; Pisani, Luigi; Pilcher, David
Source
Subject
*MEDICAL research
*INFORMATION technology
*MEDICAL specialties & specialists
*ARTIFICIAL intelligence
*DATA extraction
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
0090-3493
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Clinical quality registries (CQRs) have been implemented worldwide by several medical specialties aiming to generate a better characterization of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes of patients. National ICU registries were created almost 3 decades ago to improve the understanding of case-mix, resource use, and outcomes of critically ill patients. This narrative review describes the challenges, proposed solutions, and evidence generated by National ICU registries as facilitators for research and quality improvement. DATA SOURCES: English language articles were identified in PubMed using phrases related to ICU registries, CQRs, outcomes, and case-mix. STUDY SELECTION: Original research, review articles, letters, and commentaries, were considered. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from relevant literature were identified, reviewed, and integrated into a concise narrative review. DATA SYNTHESIS: CQRs have been implemented worldwide by several medical specialties aiming to generate a better characterization of epidemiology, treatments, and outcomes of patients. National ICU registries were created almost 3 decades ago to improve the understanding of case-mix, resource use, and outcomes of critically ill patients. The initial experience in European countries and in Oceania ensured that through locally generated data, ICUs could assess their performances by using risk-adjusted measures and compare their results through fair and validated benchmarking metrics with other ICUs contributing to the CQR. The accomplishment of these initiatives, coupled with the increasing adoption of information technology, resulted in a broad geographic expansion of CQRs as well as their use in quality improvement studies, clinical trials as well as international comparisons, and benchmarking for ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: ICU registries have provided increased knowledge of case-mix and outcomes of ICU patients based on real-world data and contributed to improve care delivery through quality improvement initiatives and trials. Recent increases in adoption of new technologies (i.e., cloud-based structures, artificial intelligence, machine learning) will ensure a broader and better use of data for epidemiology, healthcare policies, quality improvement, and clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]