학술논문

Considering Instructional Contexts in AAC Interventions for People with ASD and/or IDD Experiencing Complex Communicative Needs: A Single-Case Design Meta-Analysis
Document Type
Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Author
Jay B. Ganz (ORCID 0000-0002-2080-102X); James E. Pustejovsky (ORCID 0000-0003-0591-9465); Joe ReichleKimberly J. Vannest (ORCID 0000-0002-2285-0837); Margaret Foster (ORCID 0000-0002-4453-7788); April N. Haas (ORCID 0000-0001-6465-2540); Lauren M. Pierson (ORCID 0000-0002-9086-3250); Sanikan Wattanawongwan (ORCID 0000-0003-3479-5369); Armando BernalMan ChenRachel SkovS. D. Smith (ORCID 0000-0002-9474-7185)
Source
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2023 10(4):615-629.
Subject
Autism Spectrum Disorders
Intellectual Disability
Developmental Disabilities
Communication (Thought Transfer)
Needs
Children
Communication Skills
Individual Characteristics
Interpersonal Communication
Intervention
Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Context Effect
Language
English
ISSN
2195-7177
2195-7185
Abstract
For children with autism or intellectual and developmental disabilities who also have complex communication needs, communication is a necessary skill set to increase independence and quality of life. Understanding the how, where, and communication style being taught is important for identifying deficits in the field as well as which interventions are most effective. This meta-analysis sought to identify effectiveness among different settings, behavioral strategies, and moderator variables. A systematic search and screening process identified 114 eligible studies with 330 participants; overall outcomes indicate that augmentative and alternative communication interventions were effective with Tau effects ranging from 0.53 to 1.03 and log response ratio effects ranging from 0.21 to 2.90. However, no instructional context variables systematically predicted differences in intervention effectiveness.