학술논문

Transfusion-Associated Delirium in Children: No Difference Between Short Storage Versus Standard Issue RBCs.
Document Type
article
Source
Critical care medicine. 50(2)
Subject
Transfusion-Associated Delirium ABC-PICU Study Group
Erythrocytes
Animals
Humans
Rats
Rats
Sprague-Dawley
Delirium
Disease Models
Animal
Blood Transfusion
Odds Ratio
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Child
Blood Banks
Female
Male
Surveys and Questionnaires
Hematology
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Clinical Research
Brain Disorders
age of blood
Cornell assessment of pediatric delirium
delirium
pediatric critical care
red blood cell transfusions
Clinical Sciences
Nursing
Public Health and Health Services
Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
Language
Abstract
ObjectivesPrimary objective is to determine if transfusion of short storage RBCs compared with standard issue RBCs reduced risk of delirium/coma in critically ill children. Secondary objective is to assess if RBC transfusion was independently associated with delirium/coma.DesignThis study was performed in two stages. First, we compared patients receiving either short storage or standard RBCs in a multi-institutional prospective randomized controlled trial. Then, we compared all transfused patients in the randomized controlled trial with a single-center cohort of nontransfused patients matched for confounders of delirium/coma.SettingTwenty academic PICUs who participated in the Age of Transfused Blood in Critically Ill Children trial.PatientsChildren 3 days to 16 years old who were transfused RBCs within the first 7 days of admission.InterventionsSubjects were randomized to either short storage RBC study arm (defined as RBCs stored for up to seven days) or standard issue RBC study arm. In addition, subjects were screened for delirium prior to transfusion and every 12 hours after transfusion for up to 3 days.Measurements and main resultsPrimary outcome measure was development of delirium/coma within 3 days of initial transfusion. Additional outcome measures were dose-response relationship between volume of RBCs transfused and delirium/coma, and comparison of delirium/coma rates between transfused patients and individually matched nontransfused patients. We included 146 subjects in the stage I analysis; 69 were randomized to short storage RBCs and 77 to standard issue. There was no significant difference in delirium/coma development between study arms (79.5% vs 70.1%; p = 0.184). In the stage II analysis, adjusted odds for delirium in the transfused cohort was more than eight-fold higher than in the nontransfused matched cohort, even after controlling for hemoglobin (adjusted odds ratio, 8.9; CI, 2.8-28.4; p < 0.001).ConclusionsRBC transfusions (and not anemia) are independently associated with increased odds of subsequent delirium/coma. However, storage age of RBCs does not affect delirium risk.