학술논문

Age-Related Differences in the Effects of Initial Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Conservative Strategy on Long-Term Outcomes in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Circulation Journal. 2020, 84(2):252
Subject
Aortic stenosis
Aortic valve replacement
Outcomes
Valvular diseases
Language
English
ISSN
1346-9843
1347-4820
Abstract
Methods and Results:Among 1,808 asymptomatic severe AS patients in the CURRENT AS registry, there were 1,166 patients aged ≥75 years (initial AVR: n=124, and conservative: n=1,042), and 642 patients with age <75 years (initial AVR: n=167, and conservative: n=475). Median follow-up interval was 1,280 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1,012–1,611) days, and 1461 (IQR: 1,132–1,886) days in patients aged ≥ and <75 years, respectively. The favorable effect of the initial AVR strategy relative to conservative strategy for heart failure (HF) hospitalization was seen regardless of the age stratum (≥75 years: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–0.34, and <75 years: HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14–0.99, interaction P=0.35). However, the lower mortality risk of the initial AVR strategy relative to conservative strategy was significant in patients aged ≥75 years, but not in patients <75 years, with significant interaction (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20–0.61, and HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.41–1.16, interaction P=0.016).