학술논문

Comparative Test of the Effectiveness of Cefoperazone (T-1551) and Cefazolin (CEZ) on Respiratory Tract Infection by Double Blind Method (II) / 呼吸器感染症に対するCefoperazone (T-1551) とCefazolin (CEZ) の二重盲検法による薬効比較試験成績 (第2報)
Document Type
Journal Article
Author
Akio TACHIBANAAkira FUKUIAkira ITOAkira NAKASATOAkira OKUBOAkira SAITOAkira SASAKIAtsushi SAITOChiyohiko SHINDOEiro TSUBURAFumihiko MAEDAFumihiko UBAFumio MIKIFumio NAGAHAMAFusanosuke YAMASAKUHajime TAKEDAHaruhiko TOKUOMIHarumi SHISHIDOHideo IKEMOTOHideo SASAKIHideyuki HASEGAWAHirohiko NAGASAKAHiroichi TANIMOTOHiromichi KUNIKIHironobu IHARAHironori HARAHiroshi KONHiroshi SEWAKEHiroyasu KAWABEHiroyuki KOBAYASHIHisao KIMURAHisashi NAKAHATAHitoshi NAGANOIchiro NAKAYAMAIkko WATANABEIppei FUJIMORIIwao TAKANAMIIzumi HAYASHIJingoro SHIMADAJoichi KATOJunzaburo KABEKaoru OKADAKaoru OYAMAKaoru SHIMADAKatsuhiro OKAMOTOKatsumasa TOKUNAGAKazue SADAMOTOKazufuto FUKAYAKazuki KONISHIKazunori HARADAKazuo SASAKIKazuo TAKEBEKeigo MAEHARAKeiichi NAKAGAWAKeimei MASHIMOKeizo MATSUMOTOKenichi IMAMURAKenji MITSUIKentaro WATANABEKenzo SHIOTAKiyofumi ISHIKAWAKiyoshi SHIMAKohei HARAKoichi YAMANAKAKoichiro NAKADAKoji MACHIDAKojiro SEKITAKokichi FUKUSHIMAKooya SHIBAKouichi YOKOYAMAKozo MORIKunihiko SINDOKuninori SUZUKIKunio NANJOKyoko URAYAMAKyosei SODAMakio KURIHARAMasahiro TSUTSUIMasahisa OOMORIMasahito KATOMasaki HIROTAMasanori TAKAMOTOMasao KUROSAKIMasao NAKATOMIMasaru KOYAMAMasaru NASUMasashi MOURIMasataka ITOMasataka KATSUMasato HAYASHIMasatoshi NIWAYAMAMasumi TOMIZAWAMichiyasu NAKANISHIMieko KAWAIMikio HAYAKAWAMikizo SUZUKIMinoru YOSHIDAMitsuaki YOSHIOKAMitsue NISHIMURAMitsuo NAKAMURAMitsuru HAYASENaomi KIMURANoboru YANAINobuki AOKINobuo INABANobuo MAEKAWANobuo OOYANobuo SATONobuo WATANABENorio KIHARAOsamu KITAMOTOOsamu KURIMURAOsamu SEKINEOtohiko KUNIIRaiji YAMAMOTORinzo SOEJIMARyuichiro YAMASAKIRyuji SATOSaburo KITAURAShinichi MATSUOShinya YASUDAShiro KOSAKAShizuo ABEShokou NARITAShuichiro YOSHIDASumio ARAISumio YAMAOKASusumu YAGITadashi MIYAHARATadashi TAIMATadashi TAKIGAMITakahisa SAITOTakanobu MATSUMOTOTakashi INAMATSUTakashi MIKAMITakashi SUYAMATakehisa YAMAJITakehito NAKABAYASHITamotsu TAKISHIMATatsuo SUZUKITerumi TAKAHASHITeruo AOYAGITeruya ICHIKITetsuji KOROKUTetsuo FUJIKIToshiharu MATSUSHIMAToshihiro GOTOToshio HOJOToshio KIRISAWAToshiyuki YAMAMOTOTouji ODAGIRITsuneo ISHIBASHITsuneo TSUTSUMIYasuko YUASAYasumasa YOKOTAYasumichi KATOYasuo MASTUOKAYasushi UEDAYasutoshi SUZUKIYasutsugu FUKUDAYoshihiko TANOYoshihiro KUMASAKAYoshihiro TAKISHITAYoshihiro UEDAYoshimaru USUDAYoshio KINOSHITAYoshio KOBAYASHIYoshiro ODAYoshiro SAWAEYoshiteru SHIGENOYoshito NIKIYukihiko OBIGANEYuruko OKAMOTO三井 健司三木 文雄上田 泰上田 良弘中富 昌夫中山 一朗中川 圭一中村 光男中林 武仁中田 紘一郎中畑 久中西 通泰中里 堯二木 芳人井原 裕宣今 寛今村 憲市伊藤 昌孝伊藤 章佐々木 和雄佐々木 彰佐々木 英夫佐藤 信男佐藤 隆次前原 敬悟前川 暢夫前田 文彦副島 林造加藤 康道加藤 政仁加藤 錠一勝 正孝北本 治北条 敏夫北浦 三郎南条 邦夫原 宏紀原 耕平原田 一紀可部 順三郎右馬 文彦吉岡 光明吉田 秀一郎吉田 稔国井 乙彦国木 弘道堤 恒雄塩田 憲三大久保 滉大山 馨大森 雅久大谷 信夫安田 悳也宍戸 春美定本 和江宮原 正富沢 麿須美小六 哲司小坂 志朗小山 優小林 宏行小林 芳夫小田 芳郎小田切 統二小西 一樹山中 功一山作 房之輔山岡 澄夫山崎 隆一郎山本 俊幸山本 頼祗山路 武久岡本 勝博岡本 緩子岡田 薫島田 馨嶋田 甚五郎川部 汎康巣山 隆市来 輝也帯金 幸彦広田 正毅庭山 昌俊後東 俊博徳永 勝正徳臣 晴比古志摩 清成田 祥康斎藤 厚斎藤 孝久斎藤 玲斎藤 篤早川 幹夫早瀬 満星原 芳雄木下 与四男木原 令夫木村 久男木村 直躬松尾 信一松岡 康夫松島 敏春松本 慶蔵松本 隆允林 泉林 雅人柳内 登柴 孝也栗原 牧夫栗村 統桐澤 俊夫森 幸三横山 紘一横田 康正武田 元武部 和夫毛利 昌史永坂 博彦池本 秀雄沢江 義郎河合 美枝子浦山 京子深谷 一太渡辺 一功渡辺 信夫渡辺 健太郎湯浅 保子滝上 正滝下 佳寛瀧島 任瀬分 裕熊坂 義裕田野 吉彦町田 光司當麻 忠真下 啓明矢木 晋石川 清文石橋 凡雄福井 洸福島 孝吉福田 安嗣稲松 孝思稲葉 宣雄立花 昭生筒井 理裕荒井 澄夫荘田 恭聖薄田 芳丸藤木 哲郎藤森 一平螺良 英郎西村 みつゑ見上 隆谷本 普一進藤 千代彦進藤 邦彦那須 勝重野 芳輝鈴木 国功鈴木 幹三鈴木 康稔鈴木 達夫長浜 文雄長谷川 英之長野 準関根 理関田 恒二郎阿部 静夫青木 信樹青柳 昭雄高本 正祗高橋 昭三高浪 巖黒崎 正夫
Source
感染症学雑誌 / Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1980, 54(12):798
Subject
Cefazolin
Cefoperazone
Double-blind multi-clinical study
Respiratory tract infection
Language
Japanese
ISSN
0387-5911
1884-569X
Abstract
Comparative test by double blind method were conducted by administering 2 g of CPZ and 4 g of CEZ as a control per day for comparing the actions of both the medicines in order to ascertain the efficacy and safety of CPZ against respiratory tract infection.Clinical examination indicated the effectiveness of CPZ in 75.2% of the cases, while CEZ proved effective in 56.5% of the cases, and showed that CPZ was significantly advantageous over CEZ.CPZ showed a signifficant advantage over CEZ against the individual diseases. In the cases involving bacterial pneumonia, CPZ was effective in 86.2% of the cases, while CEZ was effective in 64.4% and in the cases involving chronic respiratory tract infection, CPZ showed an efficacy of 63.6%, while CEZ was effective in 40.0% of the cases.As regards the bacteriological effects of the medicines, CPZ showed a significantly high efficacy in Gram-negative bacteria. CPZ was effective in 70.6% of the cases, while CEZ was effective in 54.5%, even though Pseudomonas, Enterobacter and H. influenzae having no or very little sensitivity to CEZ were excluded from consideration.No significant difference was observed between the two medicines in the manifestation of any side effect or abnormality in laboratory findings. All of such side effects and abnormalities that were observed were merely of the type usually observed with medicines composed of β-lactam.The utility of CPZ was significantly superior to that of CEZ.In view of the foregoing results, CPZ would be sufficient for effective treatment of respiratory tract infection.