학술논문

The 2018 update of the U.S. National Seismic Hazard Model; ground motion models in the Western U.S.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Earthquake Spectra. 37(4):2315-2341
Subject
19|Seismology
acceleration
active margins
amplitude
basin effect
basins
bedrock
body waves
California
Cascadia subduction zone
cratons
crust
depth
earthquakes
elastic waves
faults
frequency
Garlock Fault
geologic hazards
ground motion
Hayward Fault
King County Washington
Los Angeles Basin
Los Angeles California
Los Angeles County California
magnitude
mapping
natural hazards
normal faults
Oregon
peak ground acceleration
plate tectonics
regulations
reverse faults
S-waves
Salt Lake City Utah
Salt Lake County Utah
San Andreas Fault
San Francisco California
San Francisco County California
San Jacinto Fault
Seattle Washington
sediments
seismic sources
seismic waves
shallow-focus earthquakes
site effects
slabs
slip rates
soils
spectra
statistical analysis
stiffness
strike-slip faults
subduction
U. S. National Seismic Hazard Model
United States
upper crust
Utah
velocity
Wasatch Front
Washington
wave amplification
Western U.S.
Language
English
ISSN
8755-2930
Abstract
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) is the scientific foundation of seismic design regulations in the United States and is regularly updated to consider the best available science and data. The 2018 update of the conterminous U.S. NSHM includes significant changes to the underlying ground motion models (GMMs), most of which are necessary to enable the new multi-period response spectra (MPRS) requirements of seismic design regulations that use hazard results for 22 spectral periods and eight site classes. This article focuses on the GMMs used in the western United States (WUS) and is a companion to a recent article on the GMMs used in the central and eastern United States (CEUS). In the WUS, for crustal and subduction earthquakes, two models used in previous versions of the NSHM are excluded to provide consistency over all considered periods and site classes. To more accurately estimate ground motions at long periods in the vicinity of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Salt Lake City, and Seattle, the 2018 NSHM incorporates deep sedimentary basin depth from local seismic velocity models. The subduction GMMs considered lack basin depth terms and are modified to include an additional scale factor to account for this. This article documents the WUS GMMs used in the 2018 NSHM update and provides detail on the changes to GMM medians, aleatory variability, epistemic uncertainty, and site-effect models. It compares each of these components with those considered in prior NSHMs and discusses their total effect on hazard.