학술논문
Volatile Anesthetics versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery
Document Type
Report
Author
Landoni, G.; Lomivorotov, V. V.; Nigro Neto, C.; Monaco, F.; Pasyuga, V. V.; Bradic, N.; Lembo, R.; Gazivoda, G.; Likhvantsev, V. V.; C. Lei; Lozovskiy, A.; Di Tomasso, N.; Bukamal, N.A.R.; Silva, F. S.; Bautin, A. E.; J. Ma; Crivellari, M.; Farag, A.M.G.A.; Uvaliev, N. S.; Carollo, C.; Pieri, M.; Kunstyr, J.; C. Y. Wang; Belletti, A.; Hajjar, L. A.; Grigoryev, E. V.; Agro, F. E.; Riha, H.; El-Tahan, M. R.; Scandroglio, A. M.; Elnakera, A. M.; Baiocchi, M.; Navalesi, P.; Shmyrev, V. A.; Severi, L.; Hegazy, M. A.; Crescenzi, G.; Ponomarev, D. N.; Brazzi, L.; Arnoni, R.; Tarasov, D. G.; Jovic, M.; Calabro, M. G.; Bove, T.; Bellomo, R.; Zangrillo, A.
Source
The New England Journal of Medicine. March 28, 2019, Vol. 380 Issue 13, p1214, 12 p.
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0028-4793
Abstract
The study aims to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of volatile anesthetics as against total intravenous anesthesia for patients with cardiac surgery. The results indicate that among these patients, anesthesia with a volatile agent did not result in significantly lesser mortality at 1 year.