학술논문

Evaluation of the Backflashover Performance of a 150 kV Overhead Transmission Line Considering Frequency- and Current-Dependent Effects of Tower Grounding Systems
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications IEEE Trans. on Ind. Applicat. Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on. 60(2):2611-2620 Apr, 2024
Subject
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Signal Processing and Analysis
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Grounding
Poles and towers
Soil
Lightning
Computational modeling
Integrated circuit modeling
Adaptation models
Backflashover
EMTP
fast-front transients
grounding
hybrid method
insulation coordination
lightning
overhead transmission lines
Language
ISSN
0093-9994
1939-9367
Abstract
The influence of the frequency- and current-dependent response of tower grounding systems on evaluating the backflashover performance of a typical 150 kV overhead transmission line is investigated in this study. This is achieved by adopting different tower grounding system modeling approaches in ATP-EMTP simulations: 1) a simple resistor (constant resistance value), 2) the frequency-dependent (FD) grounding system response with constant electrical properties of soil, 3) the FD response with FD soil properties, and 4) a soil ionization model. FD responses for concentrated and extended tower grounding systems are obtained via a hybrid method based on electromagnetic field analysis and circuit theory. Backflashover rate, BFR , is estimated by obtaining the minimum backflashover current of the line through ATP-EMTP simulations. Different first return-stroke currents of negative downward lightning flashes are employed in simulations, namely CIGRE WG 33.01 waveforms considering the statistical distributions of their parameters, recorded waveforms, and approximations of the latter with the CIGRE waveform. The impact of the lightning peak current distribution on BFR results is assessed. The evaluated backflashover performance is affected considerably by the FD tower grounding system response for extended systems, whereas by soil ionization for concentrated systems; for the latter, FD effects influence BFR mainly for low soil resistivity values.