학술논문

Augmented Reality to Assess Short-Term Spatial Memory: A Comparative Study of Olfactory, Visual, and Tactile Stimuli
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Access Access, IEEE. 12:47041-47056 2024
Subject
Aerospace
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Engineered Materials, Dielectrics and Plasmas
Engineering Profession
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
General Topics for Engineers
Geoscience
Nuclear Engineering
Photonics and Electrooptics
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Transportation
Olfactory
Task analysis
Visualization
Simultaneous localization and mapping
Augmented reality
Virtual environments
Navigation
Quality assessment
Spatial resolution
Assessment
augmented reality
olfactory stimuli
short-term memory
simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
spatial memory
tactile stimuli
visual stimuli
Language
ISSN
2169-3536
Abstract
This work presents an Augmented Reality application based on SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) for the assessment of spatial memory involving olfactory stimuli. A study was carried with twenty-five adults. The participants of the study completed two phases (a learning phase and an evaluation phase). In the learning phase, the participants physically walk around a real environment and have to remember the location of olfactory stimuli. In the evaluation phase, the participants have to remember the location of olfactory stimuli learned in the previous phase. The data of this study is compared with those obtained in a previous study involving visual and tactile stimuli (N = 47). The results indicate that the olfactory stimuli did not offer significant differences with respect to the visual stimuli for the correct placement of stimuli and the number of attempts in the evaluation phase. The olfactory stimuli had better results compared to the tactile stimuli for the correct placement of the stimuli in the evaluation phase and there was a significantly lower number of attempts. The time required in the learning and evaluation phases was greater for the olfactory stimuli compared to the other two stimuli, which is justified by the physical and mechanical characteristics of each of the stimuli. The results show that this type of memory task for the olfactory stimuli is independent of gender and age. All of these results suggest that olfactory stimuli are valid stimuli for assessing the memorization of olfactory-spatial associations and are similar to the level of visual stimuli and better than tactile stimuli.