학술논문
The influence of diversity on the measurement of functional impairment: An international validation of the Amsterdam IADL Questionnaire in eight countries
Document Type
article
Author
Mark A. Dubbelman; Merike Verrijp; David Facal; Gonzalo Sánchez‐Benavides; Laura J.E. Brown; Wiesje M. vander Flier; Hanna Jokinen; Athene Lee; Iracema Leroi; Cristina Lojo‐Seoane; Vuk Milošević; José Luís Molinuevo; Arturo X. Pereiro Rozas; Craig Ritchie; Stephen Salloway; Gemma Stringer; Stelios Zygouris; Bruno Dubois; Stéphane Epelbaum; Philip Scheltens; Sietske A.M. Sikkes
Source
Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
2352-8729
Abstract
Abstract Introduction To understand the potential influence of diversity on the measurement of functional impairment in dementia, we aimed to investigate possible bias caused by age, gender, education, and cultural differences. Methods A total of 3571 individuals (67.1 ± 9.5 years old, 44.7% female) from The Netherlands, Spain, France, United States, United Kingdom, Greece, Serbia, and Finland were included. Functional impairment was measured using the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Questionnaire. Item bias was assessed using differential item functioning (DIF) analysis. Results There were some differences in activity endorsement. A few items showed statistically significant DIF. However, there was no evidence of meaningful item bias: Effect sizes were low (ΔR2 range 0‐0.03). Impact on total scores was minimal. Discussion The results imply a limited bias for age, gender, education, and culture in the measurement of functional impairment. This study provides an important step in recognizing the potential influence of diversity on primary outcomes in dementia research.