학술논문

Pre-treatment bone mineral density (BMD) and the benefit of pharmacologic treatment on fracture risk and BMD change: analysis from the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Schini M; Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.; Vilaca T; Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.; Lui LY; Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Ewing SK; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Thompson A; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Vittinghoff E; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Bauer DC; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Bouxsein ML; Center for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.; Black DM; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.; Eastell R; Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Source
Publisher: Oxford University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8610640 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1523-4681 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08840431 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Bone Miner Res Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Some osteoporosis drug trials have suggested that treatment is more effective in those with low bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This study used data from a large set of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether the anti-fracture efficacy of treatments differs according to baseline BMD. We used individual patient data from 25 RCTs (103 086 subjects) of osteoporosis medications collected as part of the FNIH-ASBMR SABRE project. Participants were stratified into femoral neck (FN) BMD T-score subgroups (≤ -2.5, > -2.5). We used Cox proportional hazard regression to estimate treatment effect for clinical fracture outcomes and logistic regression for the radiographic vertebral fracture outcome. We also performed analyses based on BMD quintiles. Overall, 42% had a FN BMD T-score ≤ -2.5. Treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs led to significant reductions in fractures in both T-score ≤ -2.5 and > -2.5 subgroups. Compared to those with FN BMD T-score > -2.5, the risk reduction for each fracture outcome was greater in those with T-score ≤ -2.5, but only the all fracture outcome reached statistical significance (interaction p = 0.001). Results were similar when limited to bisphosphonate trials. In the quintile analysis, there was significant anti-fracture efficacy across all quintiles for vertebral fractures and with greater effects on fracture risk reduction for non-vertebral, all and all clinical fractures in the lower BMD quintiles (all interaction p ≤ 0.03). In summary, anti-osteoporotic medications reduced the risk of fractures regardless of baseline BMD. Significant fracture risk reduction with treatment for 4 of the 5 fracture endpoints was seen in participants with T-scores above -2.5, though effects tended to be larger and more significant in those with baseline T-scores <-2.5.
(© The Author(s) [2024]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)