학술논문

Management of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly high-risk patients: external fixation vs. skeletal traction.
Document Type
Article
Source
Feyz Journal of Kashan University of Medical Sciences. 2014, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p181-188. 8p.
Subject
*FRACTURE fixation
*BONE fractures
*HIP joint injuries
*LENGTH of stay in hospitals
*ORTHOPEDIC implants
*ORTHOPEDIC traction
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
Language
Persian
ISSN
1029-7855
Abstract
Background: There are several methods to manage intertrochanteric fractures. The external fixation device could produce favorable clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it has a lower rate of morbidity. Therefore, this study aimed to compare two different methods for the reduction of the intertrochanteric fracture in elderly high-risk patients: external fixator vs. skeletal traction. Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 60 elderly patients (mean age, 78 years) with a pertrochanteric fracture were randomly assigned to the two groups and treated with either skeletal traction (group A) or external fixation (group B). Results: Significant improvements were observed in all fractures; acceptable reduction was achieved in 8 patients in group A and 26 patients in group B. The mean length of hospitalization was 14.3 days for group A and 2.2 for the group B. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding the acceptable reduction of fracture and duration of hospitalization (P<0.05). At 12 months after surgery, the mean Harris hip scores were 57 and 66 in the group A and B, respectively. Conclusion: Management with external fixator is an effective method for intertrochanteric fractures in elderly high-risk patients. Its advantages include quick and simple application, minimal blood loss, less radiation exposure, early discharge from hospital, low costs and favorable functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]