학술논문

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for Rejection Surveillance After Cardiac Transplantation.
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Circulation. 6/21/2022, Vol. 145 Issue 25, p1811-1824. 14p.
Subject
*HEART transplantation
*TRANSPLANTATION of organs, tissues, etc.
*KIDNEY transplantation
*MAGNETIC resonance
*HEART transplant recipients
*GRAFT rejection
*ODDS ratio
*PILOT projects
*RESEARCH
*MYOCARDIUM
*BIOPSY
*CARDIOMYOPATHIES
*CROSS-sectional method
*RESEARCH methodology
*NUCLEAR magnetic resonance spectroscopy
*EVALUATION research
*COMPARATIVE studies
*RANDOMIZED controlled trials
*LONGITUDINAL method
Language
ISSN
0009-7322
Abstract
Background: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard method for surveillance of acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR) despite its invasive nature. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based myocardial tissue characterization allows detection of myocarditis. The feasibility of CMR-based surveillance for ACAR-induced myocarditis in the first year after heart transplantation is currently undescribed.Methods: CMR-based multiparametric mapping was initially assessed in a prospective cross-sectional fashion to establish agreement between CMR- and EMB-based ACAR and to determine CMR cutoff values between rejection grades. A prospective randomized noninferiority pilot study was then undertaken in adult orthotopic heart transplant recipients who were randomized at 4 weeks after orthotopic heart transplantation to either CMR- or EMB-based rejection surveillance. Clinical end points were assessed at 52 weeks.Results: Four hundred one CMR studies and 354 EMB procedures were performed in 106 participants. Forty heart transplant recipients were randomized. CMR-based multiparametric assessment was highly reproducible and reliable at detecting ACAR (area under the curve, 0.92; sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 92%; negative predictive value, 99%) with greater specificity and negative predictive value than either T1 or T2 parametric CMR mapping alone. High-grade rejection occurred in similar numbers of patients in each randomized group (CMR, n=7; EMB, n=8; P=0.74). Despite similarities in immunosuppression requirements, kidney function, and mortality between groups, the rates of hospitalization (9 of 20 [45%] versus 18 of 20 [90%]; odds ratio, 0.091; P=0.006) and infection (7 of 20 [35%] versus 14 of 20 [70%]; odds ratio, 0.192; P=0,019) were lower in the CMR group. On 15 occasions (6%), patients who were randomized to the CMR arm underwent EMB for clarification or logistic reasons, representing a 94% reduction in the requirement for EMB-based surveillance.Conclusions: A noninvasive CMR-based surveillance strategy for ACAR in the first year after orthotopic heart transplantation is feasible compared with EMB-based surveillance.Registration: HREC/13/SVH/66 and HREC/17/SVH/80.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000672257. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]