학술논문

Dose‐escalation trial of combination dabrafenib, trametinib, and AT13387 in patients with BRAF‐mutant solid tumors.
Document Type
Article
Source
Cancer (0008543X). Jun2023, Vol. 129 Issue 12, p1904-1918. 15p.
Subject
*EPIDERMAL growth factor receptors
*HEAT shock proteins
Language
ISSN
0008-543X
Abstract
Background: Combination BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy is an active regimen in patients who have BRAFV600E‐mutated tumors; however, the clinical efficacy of this therapy is limited by resistance. Preclinically, the addition of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibition improves the efficacy of BRAF inhibitor therapy in both BRAF inhibitor–sensitive and BRAF inhibitor–resistant mutant cell lines. Methods: Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program study 9557 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02097225) is a phase 1 study that was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the small‐molecule HSP90 inhibitor, AT13387, in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in BRAFV600E/K–mutant solid tumors. Correlative analyses evaluated the expression of HSP90 client proteins and chaperones. Results: Twenty‐two patients with metastatic, BRAFV600E–mutant solid tumors were enrolled using a 3 + 3 design at four dose levels, and 21 patients were evaluable for efficacy assessment. The most common tumor type was colorectal cancer (N = 12). Dose‐limiting toxicities occurred in one patient at dose level 3 and in one patient at dose level 4; specifically, myelosuppression and fatigue, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was oral dabafenib 150 mg twice daily, oral trametinib 2 mg once daily, and intravenous AT13387 260 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. The best response was a partial response in two patients and stable disease in eight patients, with an overall response rate of 9.5% (90% exact confidence interval [CI], 2%–27%), a disease control rate of 47.6% (90% CI, 29%–67%), and a median overall survival of 5.1 months (90% CI, 3.4–7.6 months). There were no consistent proteomic changes associated with response or resistance, although responders did have reductions in BRAF expression, and epidermal growth factor receptor downregulation using HSP90 inhibition was observed in one patient who had colorectal cancer. Conclusions: HSP90 inhibition combined with BRAF/MEK inhibition was safe and produced evidence of modest disease control in a heavily pretreated population. Additional translational work may identify tumor types and resistance mechanisms that are most sensitive to this approach. Heat shock protein 90 inhibition combined with BRAF/MEK inhibition was safe and produced evidence of disease control in a heavily pretreated population of patients with BRAFV600E–mutant solid tumors. Translational work is needed to identify the tumor types and mechanisms of resistance most sensitive to this targeted approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]