학술논문

Sporadic outbreaks of crimean-congo haemorrhagic fever in Uganda, July 2018-January 2019.
Document Type
Article
Source
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 3/8/2021, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p1-12. 12p.
Subject
*HEMORRHAGIC fever
*TICK infestations
*TICK control
*ANIMAL industry
*ABDOMINAL pain
*SYMPTOMS
Language
ISSN
1935-2727
Abstract
Introduction: Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a tick-borne, zoonotic viral disease that causes haemorrhagic symptoms. Despite having eight confirmed outbreaks between 2013 and 2017, all within Uganda's 'cattle corridor', no targeted tick control programs exist in Uganda to prevent disease. During a seven-month-period from July 2018-January 2019, the Ministry of Health confirmed multiple independent CCHF outbreaks. We investigated to identify risk factors and recommend interventions to prevent future outbreaks. Methods: We defined a confirmed case as sudden onset of fever (≥37.5°C) with ≥4 of the following signs and symptoms: anorexia, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, abdominal pain, joint pain, or sudden unexplained bleeding in a resident of the affected districts who tested positive for Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFv) by RT-PCR from 1 July 2018–30 January 2019. We reviewed medical records and performed active case-finding. We conducted a case-control study and compared exposures of case-patients with age-, sex-, and sub-county-matched control-persons (1:4). Results: We identified 14 confirmed cases (64% males) with five deaths (case-fatality rate: 36%) from 11 districts in western and central region. Of these, eight (73%) case-patients resided in Uganda's 'cattle corridor'. One outbreak involved two case-patients and the remainder involved one. All case-patients had fever and 93% had unexplained bleeding. Case-patients were aged 6–36 years, with persons aged 20–44 years more affected (AR: 7.2/1,000,000) than persons ≤19 years (2.0/1,000,000), p = 0.015. Most (93%) case-patients had contact with livestock ≤2 weeks before symptom onset. Twelve (86%) lived <1 km from grazing fields compared with 27 (48%) controls (ORM-H = 18, 95% CI = 3.2-∞) and 10 (71%) of 14 case-patients found ticks attached to their bodies ≤2 weeks before symptom onset, compared to 15 (27%) of 56 control-persons (ORM-H = 9.3, 95%CI = 1.9–46). Conclusions: CCHF outbreaks occurred sporadically during 2018–2019, both within and outside 'cattle corridor' districts of Uganda. Most cases were associated with tick exposure. The Ministry of Health should partner with the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries to develop joint nationwide tick control programs and strategies with shared responsibilities through a One Health approach. Author summary: Uganda has had multiple Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever outbreaks since 2013 when the first outbreak was confirmed. Tick exposure has been identified as the major risk factor by our study and this finding was similar with other studies done during outbreaks in Uganda. However, Uganda still lacks national tick control guidelines and indiscriminate use of acaricides (pesticides specially for ticks) has been observed widely. This has been cited to influence increased tick resistance to acaricides. Our study might not indicate whether tick resistance to acaricides has increased tick populations in Uganda however it is imperative that tick control is considered in efforts of prevention and control of CCHF outbreaks. We therefore recommend improved tick control in Uganda through national regulations on acaricide distribution and use, development of strategies to reduce tick resistance to acaricides in the country, and more community-based engagement of tick control in livestock management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]