소장자료
| LDR | 02447cam a2200313 a 4500 | ||
| 001 | 0093766732▲ | ||
| 005 | 20180519033021▲ | ||
| 008 | 151021s2016 enk b 001 0 eng c▲ | ||
| 010 | ▼a2015041403▲ | ||
| 020 | ▼a9781107128019 (hardback)▲ | ||
| 040 | ▼aDLC▼beng▼cDLC▼dDLC▼d221016▲ | ||
| 042 | ▼apcc▲ | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 | ▼aK4450▼b.K56 2016▲ |
| 082 | 0 | 0 | ▼a343/.037▼223▲ |
| 090 | ▼a343.037▼bK53d▲ | ||
| 100 | 1 | ▼aKing, Jeff,▼d1973-▲ | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | ▼aThe doctrine of odious debt in international law :▼ba restatement /▼cby Jeff King.▲ |
| 260 | ▼aCambridge, United Kingdom :▼bCambridge University Press,▼c2016.▲ | ||
| 300 | ▼axvii, 222 p. ;▼c24 cm.▲ | ||
| 490 | 0 | ▼aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ;▼v125▲ | |
| 504 | ▼aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 198-212) and index.▲ | ||
| 505 | 0 | ▼aInternational law, sovereign debt and odious debt -- The status of odious debts in international law -- The enforceability of odious debts in domestic law.▲ | |
| 520 | ▼a"There has been a considerable amount of recent writing in civil society, legal academia, among commercial lawyers, and in UN agencies and the World Bank about the doctrine of odious debt. The surge in interest arose after the fall of Saddam Hussein's Iraq in 2003, and the claims by senior members of US President George W Bush's administration that Iraq's debt might be regarded as odious. The core idea of the doctrine as traditionally presented is that some sovereign debt claims are not binding or enforceable on account of the creditor's awareness of the fact that the proceeds of the loan would be used to oppress the population of the debtor state, or would be used for personal enrichment rather than public purposes. As this article will show, there has also been a substantial degree of skepticism about the legal status of the doctrine. The precedents are regarded as meager. Courts and tribunals have avoided ruling on its existence. Provisions on odious debt were deliberately omitted in the one relevant treaty on state succession to public debts. And the picture has been complicated by the existence of a widely diverging range of understandings of the doctrine, and especially of the putative requirement that public debts be for public purposes"▲ | ||
| 650 | 0 | ▼aDebts, External▼xLaw and legislation.▲ | |
| 650 | 0 | ▼aDebts, Public▼xLaw and legislation.▲ | |
| 650 | 0 | ▼aDebt relief.▲ | |
| 650 | 0 | ▼aInternational law▲ | |
| 653 | ▼aOdious debt.▲ | ||
| 999 | ▼a정재훈▼c김정이▲ |
The doctrine of odious debt in international law :a restatement
자료유형
국외단행본
서명/책임사항
The doctrine of odious debt in international law : a restatement / by Jeff King.
개인저자
발행사항
Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press , 2016.
형태사항
xvii, 222 p. ; 24 cm.
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references (p. 198-212) and index.
내용주기
International law, sovereign debt and odious debt -- The status of odious debts in international law -- The enforceability of odious debts in domestic law.
요약주기
"There has been a considerable amount of recent writing in civil society, legal academia, among commercial lawyers, and in UN agencies and the World Bank about the doctrine of odious debt. The surge in interest arose after the fall of Saddam Hussein's Iraq in 2003, and the claims by senior members of US President George W Bush's administration that Iraq's debt might be regarded as odious. The core idea of the doctrine as traditionally presented is that some sovereign debt claims are not binding or enforceable on account of the creditor's awareness of the fact that the proceeds of the loan would be used to oppress the population of the debtor state, or would be used for personal enrichment rather than public purposes. As this article will show, there has also been a substantial degree of skepticism about the legal status of the doctrine. The precedents are regarded as meager. Courts and tribunals have avoided ruling on its existence. Provisions on odious debt were deliberately omitted in the one relevant treaty on state succession to public debts. And the picture has been complicated by the existence of a widely diverging range of understandings of the doctrine, and especially of the putative requirement that public debts be for public purposes"
주제
ISBN
9781107128019 (hardback)
청구기호
343.037 K53d
소장정보
예도서예약
서서가에없는책 신고
보보존서고신청
캠캠퍼스대출
우우선정리신청
배자료배달신청
문문자발송
출청구기호출력
학소장학술지 원문서비스
| 등록번호 | 청구기호 | 소장처 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 서비스 |
|---|
북토크
자유롭게 책을 읽고
느낀점을 적어주세요
글쓰기
느낀점을 적어주세요
청구기호 브라우징
관련 인기대출 도서