학술논문


EBSCO Discovery Service
발행년
-
(예 : 2010-2015)
전자자료 공정이용 안내

우리 대학 도서관에서 구독·제공하는 모든 전자자료(데이터베이스, 전자저널, 전자책 등)는 국내외 저작권법과 출판사와의 라이선스 계약에 따라 엄격하게 보호를 받고 있습니다.
전자자료의 비정상적 이용은 출판사로부터의 경고, 서비스 차단, 손해배상 청구 등 학교 전체에 심각한 불이익을 초래할 수 있으므로, 아래의 공정이용 지침을 반드시 준수해 주시기 바랍니다.

공정이용 지침
  • 전자자료는 개인의 학습·교육·연구 목적의 비영리적 사용에 한하여 이용할 수 있습니다.
  • 합리적인 수준의 다운로드 및 출력만 허용됩니다. (일반적으로 동일 PC에서 동일 출판사의 논문을 1일 30건 이하 다운로드할 것을 권장하며, 출판사별 기준에 따라 다를 수 있습니다.)
  • 출판사에서 제공한 논문의 URL을 수업 관련 웹사이트에 게재할 수 있으나, 출판사 원문 파일 자체를 복제·배포해서는 안 됩니다.
  • 본인의 ID/PW를 타인에게 제공하지 말고, 도용되지 않도록 철저히 관리해 주시기 바랍니다.
불공정 이용 사례
  • 전자적·기계적 수단(다운로딩 프로그램, 웹 크롤러, 로봇, 매크로, RPA 등)을 이용한 대량 다운로드
  • 동일 컴퓨터 또는 동일 IP에서 단시간 내 다수의 원문을 집중적으로 다운로드하거나, 전권(whole issue) 다운로드
  • 저장·출력한 자료를 타인에게 배포하거나 개인 블로그·웹하드 등에 업로드
  • 상업적·영리적 목적으로 자료를 전송·복제·활용
  • ID/PW를 타인에게 양도하거나 타인 계정을 도용하여 이용
  • EndNote, Mendeley 등 서지관리 프로그램의 Find Full Text 기능을 이용한 대량 다운로드
  • 출판사 콘텐츠를 생성형 AI 시스템에서 활용하는 행위(업로드, 개발, 학습, 프로그래밍, 개선 또는 강화 등)
위반 시 제재
  • 출판사에 의한 해당 IP 또는 기관 전체 접속 차단
  • 출판사 배상 요구 시 위반자 개인이 배상 책임 부담
'학술논문' 에서 검색결과 15,065건 | 목록 1~20
Academic Journal
Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 2021 Jun 01. 28(1), 68-100.
Intelligence Community Presidentially Appointed Senate Confirmed Officials (PAS) During the Administrations of Presidents George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama, and Donald J. Trump: In Brief [misc] / DeVine, Michael E.; Plagakis, Sofia
Discursive analysis of political discourse: 33 СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ: 1. Апресян Ю.Д. Экспериментальное исследование семантики русского глагола, М., Наука, 1967, С.187 2. Бабенко Л.Г. Толковый словарь русских глаголов. Идеографическое описание Английские эквиваленты. Синонимы. Антонимы, Москва, Изд. Аст-пресс, 1999. — С.237 3. Лексико–семантические группы русских глаголов//Учеб. слов.– справ./Под общ.ред. Т. В. Матвеевой. Свердловск, Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 1988 – С.37 4. Фоменко Ю.В. Семантические классы многоместных глаголов в современном русском языке, Диссертация на соискание ученой степени доктора фил.наук., Новосибирск, 1984, С.236 5. Усманова М.Г. Функционально–семантическая классификация глаголов башкирского языка, диссертация на соискание ученой степени доктора филологических наук, Уфа, 2002. DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE Mamirbaeva D.Dj. Ph.D., docent, NSPI named after Ajiniyaz, Nukus, Uzbekistan tel: +99890 6511155 Janabaeva J. Second-year MA student, KarSU named after Berdakh, Nukus, Uzbekistan Abstract: Discourse is defined as a process of real-life communication in which systemic linguistic qualities, degree of spontaneity and completeness, thematic coherence, and clarity for other people play a significant role. It's hard to overlook the fact that human communication is always influenced by the communicants' positions. It is critical that they belong to a social group and speak in a normal manner. Discourse takes into account and reflects the specific circumstances in which and for which it was created: 1) the author's communicative intents; 2) the author's relationship with the addressees; 3) various "important" and "insignificant" conditions; 4) the ideology and stylistic climate of an era in general, the concrete environment, and specific individuals to whom the message is addressed; 5) the genre and stylistic features of the message and communicative situation; 6) associations with previous experience that brought the speech act into orbit (Karasik, 2002). These characteristics and situations, as well as supporting statements and their combination with the appropriate linguistic tools, are used to assign certain categories of discourse. Literature Review V.I. Karasik's classification of discourse is based on the criterion of direction. He distinguishes two sorts of discourse: 1) personal (personal-oriented), in which the speaker acts as an individual in all of his inner world's richness; and 2) institutional (status-oriented), in which the speaker acts as a representative of a given social rank (Karasik, 2000). P. Grays, J. Austen, J. Searle, D. Gordon, J. Lakoff, N. I. Formanovskaya, and V. S. Kubryakova all accept a similar distinction between personal and institutional speech. According to Matveeva, the criterion for classifying a discourse is straightforward: classification is based on the notions of the addresser and addressee. Communication in the form of monologue is the initial type of discourse. The second sort of communication is that which occurs within the context of status and role relationships, i.e. verbal interactions between representatives of social groups. The institutional discourse is a form of communication that takes place within the context of status and role relationships. In relation to modern society the following types of an institutional discourse are allocated: political, diplomatic, administrative, legal, military, pedagogical, religious, mystical, medical, business, advertizing, sports, scientific, scenic and mass-informational (Karasik, 2000). Classification of a political discourse We propose, first and foremost, that we address the characteristics of its discursive content when referring to political speech as a sort of institutional communication. The type of public institution, which is defined by a special term in the collective consciousness of the language and generalized in the fundamental concepts of this institution, in particular, the functioning of political speech as a power, reveals the specifics of institutional discourse (Karasik, 2000). As a result, political discourse is more than just a means of communication; it also brings together certain aims and participants. The objective and participants of a discourse are determined by the type of discourse; for example, the purpose of political speech is the conquest and derivation of power; and its participants are politicians and society. We propose that you grasp a set of all key features of a political discourse that are common to all genres of this discourse and can identify it from other types of conversation under the heading of political discourse 34 content. Building a complete and precise system of distinguishing characteristics is difficult because they form a very flexible frame, the characteristics of which are dependent on the type and specificity of a particular discourse. We propose highlighting the most prevalent semantic-pragmatic categories, i.e. inherited qualities as part of the political discourse, based on the classifications of many writers (Alekseeva, 2001; Karasik, 2004; Konkov, 2011; Hlevova, 1999): The author's picture "I think that the single most essential task of any President is to safeguard the American people," Barack Obama says in his Future Vision. And I am equally certain that doing so effectively in the twenty-first century will necessitate a new vision of American leadership and a new understanding of our national security – a vision that is informed by historical lessons but not constrained by obsolete thinking" (Barack Obama, 2008). Ability of the addressee or a factor of the addressee A discourse's structure presupposes the existence of two roles: the speaker's and the addressee's. As a result, during the study of a discourse, it is feasible to recreate the mental world of communicants, details, and a reality evaluation from two perspectives: from the standpoint of discourse creation and from the standpoint of discourse comprehension. As a result, the ability of the addressee as a discourse category is one of the most important. Informational content This category characterizes all act of communication to a greater or lesser extent, although it is directly dependent on the communicative aims of a speech. The goal of political discourse and its social function is to persuade addressees to do politically right acts. Intentionality It is a discourse category that denotes the speaker's communicative intent. Any verbal work (from word to text) is uttered with a specific purpose in mind by the author. This category, like the previous one in regard to political discourse, is directly dependent on the discourse purpose, which already mandates rules of linguistic behavior to the addressee. The goal of a political discourse can be to indicate to addressees the need for action, as well as to estimate. The last component of a political discourse is linked to the next category. Emotionality and expressivity The different combinations of syntactic elements that give concrete discourses and texts, as creative embodiments of discourses, not only integrity and connectedness, but also an additional expression, form the basis of this category. In a political discourse, expressional shades can range from friendly familiar to slightly caustic, depending on the objective of their use for conveying these or those semantic features, so traditional canons of institutional, i.e. official etiquette of formulations are frequently ignored. Theatricality The term "theatricality" encompasses a combination of political, commercial, and scenic discourses. Theatricality in a political discourse is linked to the fact that one of the communication parties - the people - plays the role of the observer addressee, who sees current political events as a certain show performed for them with a captivating plot and an unpredictable ending. Politicians, when speaking with one another and with journalists, are continuously reminded of "a spectator audience" and act or "work for public," attempting to make an impact and "break an applause." Conclusion As a result, using a field approach to analyze the semantic-pragmatic structure of a political discourse allows for the discovery of not only all of the distinctive aspects of this type of discourse, but also, to some extent, fields of contact with other types of discourse. Because of its goal, the discursive features field system can assist in identifying features that are in and out of a zone of crossing between different types of discourse, as well as confirming closer interdependence of types of discourse within each class assigned according to status characteristics. The interpretation of information in the political discourse of the mass media is a phenomenon distinct from, say, an incident that cannot be objectively observed. The human aspect is important. REFERENCES: 1. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazikovoi krug: Lichnost, kontsepty, diskurs (477 p.). Volgograd: Peremena. 2. Karasik, V. I. (2000). On the Types of Discourse. Language Personality: Institutional and Personal Discourse (pp. 5-20). Collection of Scientific Works, Change. 3. Konkov V. IActualization of Literary Works in Artistic Communication // The Social Sciences. 2016. Vol. 11. Iss. 7. Page No.: 1163-1167. DOI: 10.3923/sscience.2016.1163.1167 35 4. Barack Obama, (2008). Transcript Of Barack Obama's Victory Speech. November 5, 2008. THE EPIC POEMS «ALPAMYS» AND «BEOWULF» AS THE KARAKALPAK AND ENGLISH NATIONAL TREASURES Nurumbetova G.A. PhD, Associate Professor English Language and Literature Department, KarSU named after Berdakh, Nukus, Uzbekistan Atabaeva X. 3 rd year student, English Language and Literature Department, KarSU named after Berdakh, Nukus, Uzbekistan Abstract: Epic poems play a vital role in literature, as their functions are to commemorate struggles and adventures of kings, to elevate the status of the hero among the audiences, supernatural deeds as well as highly stylized language. This research was conducted in order to investigate if there were significant similarities and differences between the epic poems «Beowulf» and «Alpamys». It constitutes a relatively new area which has emerged from the initial analogy of literature and culture of Anglo-Saxon and Turkic people. The principal objective is comparing the way the heroes defeat enemies, international and intercultural aspects and perspectives on tranquility as apparently shown in the poems. Findings of this study revealed that in terms of the settings and verse forms, «Beowulf» consists of 3,182 alliterative lines, whereas «Alpamys» consists of 17000 lines. Statistically speaking, the results of analyzing the poems showed the obvious distinctions between the characteristics of the protagonists and antagonists. Key words : commemorate, deed, conduct, analogy, alliterative, distinction, protagonist, antagonist. Аннотация: Эпические поэмы играют жизненно важную роль в литературе, поскольку их функции заключаются в увековечении борьбы и приключений королей, повышении статуса героя среди зрителей, сверхъестественных деяниях, а также в высокой степени стилизованном языке. Это исследование было проведено с целью выяснить, существуют ли существенные сходства и различия между эпическими поэмами «Беовульф» и «Алпамыс». Оно представляет собой относительно новую область, возникшую в результате первоначальной аналогии литературы и культуры англосаксонских и тюркских народов. Основная цель – сравнить то, как герои побеждают врагов, международные и межкультурные аспекты и перспективы безмятежности и самообладания, как это явно показано в стихотворениях. Результаты этого исследования показали, что с точки зрения построения и стихотворных форм «Беовульф» состоит из 3182 аллитеративных строк, тогда как «Алпамыс» состоит из 17000 строк. С точки зрения статистики, результаты анализа стихотворений показали очевидные различия между характеристиками главных героев и антагонистов. Ключевые слова: память, поступок, поведение, аналогия, аллитерация, различие, главный герой, антагонист. In the past few decades there has been a growing interest in the study of analysis epic poetry. For instance,  «A study in comparison and contrast of Iliad and Ramayana» by Dr. Harmik Vaishnav (2019)  «The inductions of the Odyssey and the Aeneid» (1934) published by the Johns Hopkins University Press  «A comparative study of the Gilgamesh epic and Genesis» (2006) by Nozomi Osanai. Research on origins and characteristics of poetry has a long tradition. Epic poetry is an ancient genre of literature and narrates the stories depicting the mammoth deeds of great kings, help from the Gods, intrigues, fight of ideas and morals, as well as invincible warriors and their feats. The quotation of a British poet Lascelles Abercrombie (1881-1938) confirms this: «Epic poetry exhibits life in some great symbolic attitude. It cannot strictly be said to symbolize life itself, but always some manner of life». Although there are numerous common aspects in epics, conspicuous conflicting ideas of cultures and raise questions to the rational mind are shown in poems. This research will focus on a humble endeavor to compare and contrast of the prominent epic poems: «Alpamys» as a representative of Western literature and tradition and «Beowulf» as a representative of Old English literature. They are incredible examples of fighting, triumph and glory stories both of which involved in heroic events, actions of heroes determine the destiny of the nations. However, the settings and manuscripts of the poems have obvious dissimilarities. Beowulf set in pagan
Academic Journal
Ренессанс в парадигме новаций образования и технологий в XXI веке. :34-36
Dissertation/ Thesis
idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Academic Journal
20 Nev. L.J. 1177 (2019-2020) / Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 3 (Spring 2020), pp. 1177-1208
Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Joint Statement by President Barack Obama, President Enrique Pena Nieto of Mexico, and Prime Minister Stephen J. Harper of Canada: 21st Century North
Daily Compilation of Presidential Documents
Daily Compilation of Presidential Documents
Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 The President's News Conference With President Enrique Pena Nieto of
Daily Compilation of Presidential Documents
Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Remarks With President Enrique Pena Nieto of Mexico and Prime Minister Stephen J. Harper of Canada to North American Business, Civil Society, and
Daily Compilation of Presidential Documents
Daily Compilation of Presidential Documents
Academic Journal
Creative Saplings. 3:23-36
Book
Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States / 2011 / Joint Declaration by President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Stephen J. Harper of Canada: Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness
Academic Journal
Woman's Art Journal. Spring-Summer, 2024, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p15, 11 p.
검색 결과 제한하기
제한된 항목
[검색어] Barack, J.
발행연도 제한
-
학술DB(Database Provider)
저널명(출판물, Title)
출판사(Publisher)
자료유형(Source Type)
주제어
언어