학술논문
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography Exploring Women's Views of Why It Exists and Persists.
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
Subject
*COMMUNITIES
*ETHNOLOGY
*FEMALE genital mutilation
*SEXUAL health
*IMMIGRANTS
*RITES & ceremonies
*HUMAN sexuality
*SOCIAL norms
*SYSTEMATIC reviews
*QUALITATIVE research
*PATIENTS' attitudes
*GENDER nonconformity
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Language
ISSN
1931-7611
Abstract
Objectives: Despite well-documented negative consequences, female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) continues to be widely practised. In this systematic review, we investigated women's views of why FGM/C exists and persists. Methods: A meta-ethnographic approach was used in this systematic review of qualitative research. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included in this review and they represented the views and experiences of 823 women. FGM/C was considered a 'rite of passage' which was enforced to curb the expression of their sexuality and maintain social and gender norms within its communities. Nevertheless, attitudes towards FGM/C were changing among migrant populations. Conclusions: Creating community awareness projects, enforcing strict laws coupled with increasing health professional involvement may reduce the incidence of FGM/C. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]