학술논문

Contingent with quality or quality contingent?
Document Type
Article
Author
Source
Teaching Theology & Religion; Oct2019, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p302-305, 4p
Subject
Religious studies
Theological education
Ideology
College teachers
Higher education
Church history
Language
ISSN
13684868
Abstract
The world of the modern academy relies heavily upon contingent faculty in the teaching and training of students. Theological studies readily evidences this practice in innumerable ways. While the contingent faculty member is intrinsic to the mission of many modern schools, this piece ponders whether or not a trade‐off exists in the quality of learning contingent faculty can offer in comparison to residential or tenure track faculty members? The piece explores the constraints that many contingent faculty face in the world of theological education and asks the academy at large if such limits are something it really feels comfortable with. Ultimately, the piece voices a view that the modern academy must come to grips with its utilization of contingent faculty both for the sake of those faculty members, but more‐so for the sake of its students. See companion essays published in this issue of the journal by Hoon J. Lee, Bradley Burroughs, Kyle Schenkewitz, and Charles Harrell. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]