학술논문

The quest for marketing intangibles
Document Type
Journal Article
Source
Intertax 2006, 34(1), 2-9
Subject
Australia
EC law
France
Germany
Intangible assets
Japan
Netherlands
Tax
Transfer pricing
United States
Language
English
ISSN
0165-2826
Abstract
Discusses the concept of marketing intangibles. Comments on US transfer pricing rules and case law illustrating the evolution of the marketing intangibles concept, including DHL Corp v Internal Revenue Commissioner on whether the Internal Revenue Service could impute a trademark royalty for the use of the DHL trade name by the company's foreign affiliates. Notes the Organisation for Economic Development (OECD) discussion of the impact of marketing intangibles on the allocation of profits to headquarters or permanent establishments. Compares the approach of the German, Dutch, French, Japanese and Australian tax authorities to marketing intangibles.