학술논문

Onsite response to the accident at Chernobyl (accident management)
Document Type
Journal Article
Author
Source
Nucl. Saf.; (United States); 28:1
Subject
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS CHERNOBYLSK-4 REACTOR
REACTOR ACCIDENTS
MANAGEMENT
ACTIVITY LEVELS
CORIUM
DECONTAMINATION
DOSIMETRY
EMERGENCY PLANS
FIRE FIGHTING
FIRES
GRAPHITE
INFORMATION NEEDS
MITIGATION
OXYGEN
RADIATION DOSES
RADIATION PROTECTION
REACTOR CORE DISRUPTION
REMOTE HANDLING
RESEARCH PROGRAMS
ROBOTS
USSR
ACCIDENTS
ASIA
CARBON
CLEANING
DOSES
EASTERN EUROPE
ELEMENTAL MINERALS
ELEMENTS
ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS
EUROPE
GRAPHITE MODERATED REACTORS
LWGR TYPE REACTORS
MINERALS
NONMETALS
POWER REACTORS
REACTORS
THERMAL REACTORS
WATER COOLED REACTORS 220900* -- Nuclear Reactor Technology-- Reactor Safety
210400 -- Power Reactors, Nonbreeding, Otherwise Moderated or Unmoderated
Language
English
Abstract
In summarizing the information provided in the USSR report on plant stabilization shortly after the accident at Chernobyl and on the early response measures, the following three main stages can be identified: (1) the building fire-fighting actions and measures (techniques) undertaken and their effectiveness in controlling and finally extinguishing the fire; (2) the short-term stabilization of the plant immediately following the accident; and (3) the long-term recovery, including entombment of the damaged unit and the monitoring of the evolution and long-term stability of the entombed core debris and reactor building. Clearly, the information provided in the USSR report and the additional discussions indicated the importance of accident management. The science and technology of nuclear accident management has not been neglected in the nuclear field; however, attention to this aspect of nuclear safety research has been necessarily largely theoretical. Consequently the practical and very successful experience at the Chernobyl site is of great interest and should be further analyzed and documented.