학술논문

Brain regulation of emotional conflict predicts antidepressant treatment response for depression
Document Type
article
Source
Nature Human Behaviour. 3(12)
Subject
Biological Psychology
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Psychology
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
Neurosciences
Brain Disorders
Clinical Research
Mind and Body
Behavioral and Social Science
Mental Health
Depression
6.1 Pharmaceuticals
Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions
Mental health
Good Health and Well Being
Antidepressive Agents
Antidepressive Agents
Second-Generation
Brain
Clinical Trials as Topic
Depressive Disorder
Major
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neuroimaging
Treatment Outcome
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Health sciences
Language
Abstract
The efficacy of antidepressant treatment for depression is controversial due to the only modest superiority demonstrated over placebo. However, neurobiological heterogeneity within depression may limit overall antidepressant efficacy. We sought to identify a neurobiological phenotype responsive to antidepressant treatment by testing pretreatment brain activation during response to, and regulation of, emotional conflict as a moderator of the clinical benefit of the antidepressant sertraline versus placebo. Using neuroimaging data from a large randomized controlled trial, we found widespread moderation of clinical benefits by brain activity during regulation of emotional conflict, in which greater downregulation of conflict-responsive regions predicted better sertraline outcomes. Treatment-predictive machine learning using brain metrics outperformed a model trained on clinical and demographic variables. Our findings demonstrate that antidepressant response is predicted by brain activity underlying a key self-regulatory emotional capacity. Leveraging brain-based measures in psychiatry will forge a path toward better treatment personalization, refined mechanistic insights and improved outcomes.