학술논문

Blood Transcriptional Biomarkers for Active Tuberculosis among Patients in the United States: a Case-Control Study with Systematic Cross-Classifier Evaluation
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 54(2)
Subject
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Clinical Sciences
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Clinical Research
Lung
Rare Diseases
Genetics
Tuberculosis
Sexually Transmitted Infections
HIV/AIDS
Infectious Diseases
4.1 Discovery and preclinical testing of markers and technologies
4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies
Detection
screening and diagnosis
Infection
Good Health and Well Being
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Biomarkers
Case-Control Studies
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
Latent Tuberculosis
Male
Middle Aged
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Pneumonia
ROC Curve
Transcriptome
United States
Young Adult
Biological Sciences
Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences
Microbiology
Clinical sciences
Medical microbiology
Language
Abstract
UnlabelledBlood transcriptional signatures are promising for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis but have not been evaluated among U.S.PatientsTo be used clinically, transcriptional classifiers need reproducible accuracy in diverse populations that vary in genetic composition, disease spectrum and severity, and comorbidities. In a prospective case-control study, we identified novel transcriptional classifiers for active TB among U.S. patients and systematically compared their accuracy to classifiers from published studies. Blood samples from HIV-uninfected U.S. adults with active TB, pneumonia, or latent TB infection underwent whole-transcriptome microarray. We used support vector machines to classify disease state based on transcriptional patterns. We externally validated our classifiers using data from sub-Saharan African cohorts and evaluated previously published transcriptional classifiers in our population. Our classifier distinguishing active TB from pneumonia had an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 96.5% (95.4% to 97.6%) among U.S. patients, but the AUC was lower (90.6% [89.6% to 91.7%]) in HIV-uninfected Sub-Saharan Africans. Previously published comparable classifiers had AUC values of 90.0% (87.7% to 92.3%) and 82.9% (80.8% to 85.1%) when tested in U.S.PatientsOur classifier distinguishing active TB from latent TB had AUC values of 95.9% (95.2% to 96.6%) among U.S. patients and 95.3% (94.7% to 96.0%) among Sub-Saharan Africans. Previously published comparable classifiers had AUC values of 98.0% (97.4% to 98.7%) and 94.8% (92.9% to 96.8%) when tested in U.S.PatientsBlood transcriptional classifiers accurately detected active TB among U.S. adults. The accuracy of classifiers for active TB versus that of other diseases decreased when tested in new populations with different disease controls, suggesting additional studies are required to enhance generalizability. Classifiers that distinguish active TB from latent TB are accurate and generalizable across populations and can be explored as screening assays.