부산대학교 도서관

OBJECTIVE: We applied a user experience (UX) design approach to clinical decision support (CDS) tool development for the specific use case of pediatric asthma. Our objective was to understand physicians workflows, decision-making processes, barriers (ie, pain points), and facilitators to increase usability of the tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a mixed-methods approach with semi-structured interviews and surveys. The coded interviews were synthesized into physician-user journey maps (ie, visualization of a process to accomplish goals) and personas (ie, user types). Interviews were conducted via video. We developed physician journey maps and user personas informed by their goals, systems interactions, and experiences with pediatric asthma management. RESULTS: The physician end-user personas identified were: efficiency, relationship, and learning. Features of a potential asthma CDS tool sought varied by physician practice type and persona. It was important to the physician end-user that the asthma CDS tool demonstrate value by lowering workflow friction (ie, difficulty or obstacles), improving the environment surrounding physicians and patients, and using it as a teaching tool. Customizability versus standardization were important considerations for uptake. DISCUSSION: Different values and motivations of physicians influence their use and interaction with the EHR and CDS tools. These different perspectives can be captured by applying a UX design approach to the development process. For example, with the importance of customizability, one approach may be to build a core module with variations depending on end-user preference. CONCLUSION: A UX approach can drive design to help understand physician-users and meet their needs; ultimately with the goal of increased uptake.