학술논문
Cost-Effectiveness of an Antibacterial Envelope for CIED Infection Prevention in the US Healthcare System from the WRAP-IT Trial
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Wilkoff, Bruce L.; Boriani, Giuseppe; Mittal, Suneet; Poole, Jeanne E.; Kennergren, Charles; Corey, Ralph; Krahn, Andrew D.; Schloss, Edward J.; Gallastegui, Jose L.; Pickett, Robert A.; Evonich, Rudolph F.; Roark, Steven F.; Sorrentino, Denise M.; Sholevar, Darius P.; Cronin, Edmond M.; Berman, Brett J.; Riggio, David W.; Khan, Hafiza H.; Silver, Marc T.; Collier, Jack; Eldadah, Zayd; Holbrook, Reece; Lande, Jeff D.; Lexcen, Daniel R.; Seshadri, Swathi; Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
Source
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. Oct 06, 2020
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1941-3149
Abstract
BACKGROUND–: In the WRAP-IT trial, adjunctive use of an absorbable antibacterial envelope resulted in a 40% reduction of major cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection without increased risk of complication in 6,983 patients undergoing CIED revision, replacement, upgrade, or initial cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implant. There is limited information on the cost-effectiveness of this strategy. As a pre-specified objective, we evaluated antibacterial envelope cost-effectiveness compared to standard-of-care infection prevention strategies in the US healthcare system. METHODS–: A decision tree model was used to compare costs and outcomes of antibacterial envelope (TYRX) use adjunctive to standard-of-care infection prevention vs. standard-of-care alone over a lifelong time horizon. The analysis was performed from an integrated payer-provider network perspective. Infection rates, antibacterial envelope effectiveness, infection treatment costs and patterns, infection-related mortality, and utility estimates were obtained from the WRAP-IT trial. Life expectancy and long-term costs associated with device replacement, follow-up, and healthcare utilization were sourced from the literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 3%. An upper willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY was used to determine cost-effectiveness, in alignment with American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) practice guidelines and as supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) and contemporary literature. RESULTS–: The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the antibacterial envelope compared to standard-of-care was $112,603/QALY. The ICER remained lower than the WTP threshold in 74% of iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and was most sensitive to the following model inputs: infection-related mortality, life expectancy, and infection cost. CONCLUSIONS–: The absorbable antibacterial envelope was associated with a cost-effectiveness ratio below contemporary benchmarks in the WRAP-IT patient population, suggesting that the envelope provides value for the US healthcare system by reducing the incidence of CIED infection. REGISTRATION:: Clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02277990