학술논문

Rasterising Epidemiological Host Data Efficiently
Document Type
Conference
Source
2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on. :232-237 Mar, 2014
Subject
Aerospace
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Engineered Materials, Dielectrics and Plasmas
Engineering Profession
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
General Topics for Engineers
Geoscience
Nuclear Engineering
Photonics and Electrooptics
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Transportation
Vectors
Libraries
Ash
Lakes
Data models
Computational modeling
Diseases
geographic information systems
rasterisation
vector processing
open source
preprocessing
Language
Abstract
Geographic data can roughly be divided into two main categories: vectors (including polygons, lines and points) and rasters (composed of uniform grid squares). Rasterisation is necessary for geographic tools that operate on raster data when the original data are represented using vectors. Our research group is interested in modelling the spread of disease through heterogeneous woodland landscapes: we employ simulation tools on rasterised landscapes, but forestry information is typically provided as polygons. We must therefore determine, for each grid square, how much of its area is made up of a particular species of tree. Up until now, Esri's ArcGIS has been used to calculate the intersection between polygons and grid squares, but this approach is unfeasibly slow and requires workarounds for large data sets and finely resolved grids. In this paper, we introduce a new approach towards solving this problem using the Clipper Library, a free open-source implementation of Vatti's clipping algorithm. We show that Clipper generates grid square rasterisations of representative Ash and Larch data sets between 10 and 20 times faster than ArcGIS. Clipper produces results that are at least as accurate as ArcGIS and can be applied to larger data sets without the need for workarounds.