학술논문

Does Google Earth CRS induce bias with increasing UTM zone number?
Document Type
Conference
Source
2023 International Conference on Machine Intelligence for GeoAnalytics and Remote Sensing (MIGARS) Machine Intelligence for GeoAnalytics and Remote Sensing (MIGARS), 2023 International Conference on. 1:1-4 Jan, 2023
Subject
Computing and Processing
Geoscience
Signal Processing and Analysis
Earth
Satellites
Germanium
Distance measurement
Internet
Reliability
Spatial resolution
Usability
Remote sensing
Autonomous robots
Google Earth
Sentine1-2B
UTM Zone
Relative Planimetric Accuracy
High Precision Applications
Language
Abstract
Google Earth (GE) has been very popular since 2005 amongst remote-sensing science enthusiasts as well as administrators for its ease of use and the large archive of multiresolution temporal data covering the entire globe. With time, Google Earth has evolved to publish layers of imagery with spatial resolution estimated to be better than 30 centimeters(since GE does not publish any information related to accuracy of the imagery). Many scholars have studied the positional accuracy of Google Earth imagery from 2008 till 2018. Improvements in the positional accuracy(absolute as well as relative) were reported by many.In this study,it was attempted to understand if the CRS of Google Earth(GE) is contributing to positional inaccuracies when its imagery is assessed using reliable satellite reference data or GPS surveyed data. Relative assessment of GE location coordinates of ground check points was done using Sentine1-2B satellite imagery. Test imagery over regions of Africa, Canada, India and Australia were used and RMSE values were reported. The radial RMSE for the image check points was computed as 12.5 metres; min-max values in Easting direction were [-23.48 m,8.26 m] while min-max values in Northing direction were [-5.77m, 17. 26m]. The paper focuses on planimetric mislocation/accuracy between Google Earth and Sentine1-2B and explores direct or indirect relationship between increasing UTM zone numbers and mislocation values. The paper attempts to emphasize that there is a need for the end-user/consumer to understand that, though Google Earth is undeniably the best go-to-resource with open access and high usability rating, it has its own quality issues and should be used with caution in applications where quality and reliability are at stake. GE is indeed an excellent source of ancillary information but it is expected that the end-user be aware of inherent accuracy issues of Google Earth imagery when consuming in applications ranging from as small as a geo-spatial survey by a school community to larger projects requiring high accuracy and precision like mapping, autonomous navigation, control point surveying or satellite calibration.