학술논문
Subtyping of Group 3/4 medulloblastoma as a potential prognostic biomarker among patients treated with reduced dose of craniospinal irradiation: a Japanese Pediatric Molecular Neuro-Oncology Group study
Document Type
article
Author
Kohei Fukuoka; Jun Kurihara; Tomoko Shofuda; Naoki Kagawa; Kai Yamasaki; Ryo Ando; Joji Ishida; Masayuki Kanamori; Atsufumi Kawamura; Young-Soo Park; Chikako Kiyotani; Takuya Akai; Dai Keino; Yosuke Miyairi; Atsushi Sasaki; Junko Hirato; Takeshi Inoue; Atsuko Nakazawa; Katsuyoshi Koh; Ryo Nishikawa; Isao Date; Motoo Nagane; Koichi Ichimura; Yonehiro Kanemura
Source
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2023)
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
2051-5960
Abstract
Abstract Background One of the most significant challenges in patients with medulloblastoma is reducing the dose of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) to minimize neurological sequelae in survivors. Molecular characterization of patients receiving lower than standard dose of CSI therapy is important to facilitate further reduction of treatment burden. Methods We conducted DNA methylation analysis using an Illumina Methylation EPIC array to investigate molecular prognostic markers in 38 patients with medulloblastoma who were registered in the Japan Pediatric Molecular Neuro-Oncology Group and treated with reduced-dose CSI. Results Among the patients, 23 were classified as having a standard-risk and 15 as high-risk according to the classic classification based on tumor resection rate and presence of metastasis, respectively. The median follow-up period was 71.5 months (12.0–231.0). The median CSI dose was 18 Gy (15.0–24.0) in both groups, and 5 patients in the high-risk group received a CSI dose of 18.0 Gy. Molecular subgrouping revealed that the standard-risk cohort included 5 WNT, 2 SHH, and 16 Group 3/4 cases; all 15 patients in the high-risk cohort had Group 3/4 medulloblastoma. Among the patients with Group 3/4 medulloblastoma, 9 of the 31 Group 3/4 cases were subclassified as subclass II, III, and V, which were known to an association with poor prognosis according to the novel subtyping among the subgroups. Patients with poor prognostic subtype showed worse prognosis than that of others (5-year progression survival rate 90.4% vs. 22.2%; p