학술논문

Chinese orthopaedic nurses' knowledge, attitude and venous thromboembolic prophylactic practices: A multicentric cross‐sectional survey.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Clinical Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). Mar2021, Vol. 30 Issue 5/6, p773-782. 10p.
Subject
*THROMBOEMBOLISM risk factors
*NURSING audit
*RESEARCH
*NURSES' attitudes
*VEINS
*PULMONARY embolism
*STATISTICAL reliability
*CROSS-sectional method
*SELF-evaluation
*ACQUISITION of data
*COMPRESSION garments
*ORTHOPEDIC nursing
*CRONBACH'S alpha
*RISK assessment
*NURSES
*THROMBOEMBOLISM
*RESEARCH funding
*QUESTIONNAIRES
*MEDICAL records
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*QUALITY assurance
*COMPRESSION therapy
*DATA analysis software
*STATISTICAL sampling
*PATIENT safety
*CHEMOPREVENTION
*SYMPTOMS
THROMBOEMBOLISM prevention
Language
ISSN
0962-1067
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism is a severe preventable complication among orthopaedic surgical patients. Integrating therapeutic guidelines into clinical practice can help improve patient safety and reduce the burden of this pathology. Improving the quality of patient care is important for bridging the gap between the prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism and therapeutic guidelines. Objectives: This study aimed at evaluating the knowledge, attitude, and venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis practices of Chinese orthopaedic nurses to guide quality care improvements. Methods: The data used in this study are secondary data obtained from a multicentric survey. An anonymous questionnaire was used to measure the attitude and knowledge of venous thromboembolic prophylaxis among orthopaedic nurses. VTE prophylactic practices were extracted from medical records within the electronic case report form immediately after the nurses' investigations. The STROBE statement for observational studies was applied. Results: Results indicated that although 94.0% of the responding nurses had attended training courses in their wards, a majority of them (68.9%) achieved a median knowledge score of 7 points or below (range 0–9). Knowledge regarding the proper use of prophylaxis, identification of risk factors, signs and symptoms for pulmonary embolism was limited. Self‐reported attitudes underestimate the relationships between venous thromboembolism and low‐quality nursing care. Pharmacological prophylaxis was highly used (90.9%), while the utilisation of mechanical prophylaxis and its proper use was relatively low. Conclusions: Chinese orthopaedic nurses demonstrated enthusiasm for venous thromboembolism and prophylaxis. Their knowledge needs to be improved, including the proper use of prophylaxis, identification of risk factors, signs and symptoms. Mechanical prophylaxis practice for VTE prevention after THA and TKA surgical procedures is not optimistic. Further studies should analyse the causes from multiple perspectives, including the availability of resources, the knowledge and attitude of doctors, nurses and patients. Relevance to clinical practice: The findings from this study can be used to develop and implement interventions for venous thromboembolism after orthopaedic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]