Subject
*PENIS curvatures
*PATIENT satisfaction
*PENILE induration
*PENIS surgery
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*SURGICAL complications
*DOPPLER ultrasonography
*COMPARATIVE studies
*UROLOGICAL surgery
*LONGITUDINAL method
*RESEARCH methodology
*MEDICAL cooperation
*MEN
*PENIS
*PENIS diseases
*RESEARCH
*PLASTIC surgery
*SUTURES
*SUTURING
*TIME
*EVALUATION research
*PENILE erection
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
Abstract
Objective: To compare the patient's satisfaction and long-term results of 2 penile plication procedures in patients with penile curvature.Methods: This retrospective study included 387 patients with congenital penile curvature (n = 260) and Peyronie's disease (n = 127) who underwent surgical correction of penile curvature with penile plication procedures. Of the patients, 202 underwent plication of tunica albuginea with the Lue's 16-dot technique, while 185 underwent highly superficial excision of tunica albuginea with the modified Nesbit corporoplasty. Surgical outcomes and patient's satisfaction were compared between the 2 techniques in all patients.Results: The mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the 16-dot plication technique (48.1 ± 7.5 minutes), compared with the modified Nesbit corporoplasty (63 ± 16.9 minutes) (P = .001). Complete penile straightening was achieved in 87.6% of the patients who underwent 16-dot plication technique and in 89.7% of the patients who underwent modified Nesbit plication, revealing no difference (P = .514). The rates of penile sensory loss (P = .001) and de-novo erectile dysfunction (P = .016) were significantly higher in the modified Nesbit corporoplasty than in the 16-dot plication technique, but rate of suture related complications was significantly higher in the 16-dot plication technique than in the modified Nesbit corporoplasty (P = .001). The patients with congenital penile curvature had significantly less ratio of postoperative penile length loss and de-novo erectile dysfunction than Peyronie's disease patients.Conclusion: Overall, both surgical techniques have very high success and satisfaction rates with very low complication rates. However, the types of complications are significantly different between the 2 surgical procedures. Therefore, patients with penile curvature should be informed about outcomes of penile plication procedures, and surgical method should be preferred based on patient's preference and surgeon's experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]