학술논문

The impact of direct‐acting antivirals on hepatitis C viraemia among people who inject drugs in England; real‐world data 2011–2018.
Document Type
Article
Source
Journal of Viral Hepatitis. Oct2021, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p1452-1463. 12p.
Subject
*ANTIVIRAL agents
*VIREMIA
*HEALTH services accessibility
*HOMELESSNESS
*HEPATITIS C
*GENDER
*DEMOGRAPHIC characteristics
*HARM reduction
Language
ISSN
1352-0504
Abstract
Direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for anybody with viraemic HCV infection has been scaled‐up in England since 2017. To assess early impacts, we investigated trends in, and factors associated with, HCV viraemia among people who inject drugs (PWID). We also examined trends in self‐reported treatment access. Bio‐behavioural data from an annual, national surveillance survey of PWID (2011–2018) estimated trends in viraemic prevalence among HCV antibody‐positive PWID. Multivariable logistic regression identified characteristics independently associated with viraemia. Trends in treatment access were examined for PWID with known infection. Between 2011 and 2016, viraemic prevalence among antibody‐positive PWID remained stable (2011, 57.7%; 2016, 55.8%) but decreased in 2017 (49.4%) and 2018 (50.4%) (both p < 0.001). After adjustment for demographic and behavioural characteristics, there remained significant reduction in viraemia in 2017 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.94) and 2018 (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.93) compared to 2016. Other factors associated with viraemia were male gender (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.53–1.86), geographical region, injecting in past year (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13–1.41), imprisonment (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.31) and homelessness (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.31). Among non‐viraemic PWID with known infection, the proportion reporting ever receiving treatment increased in 2017 (28.7%, p < 0.001) and 2018 (38.9%, p < 0.001) compared to 2016 (14.5%). In conclusion, there has been a small reduction in HCV viraemia among antibody‐positive PWID in England since 2016, alongside DAA scale‐up, and some indication that treatment access has improved in the same period. Population‐level monitoring and focus on harm reduction is critical for achieving and evaluating elimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]