부산대학교 도서관

The purpose of this study was to assess the management of both hypertension and micro/macroalbuminuria in a cohort of type II diabetic patients. In the first 6 months of the year 2000, 5815 diabetic patients were identified through prescriptions for antidiabetic drugs in our sanitary district (191 568 inhabitants). In all, 65% (3810) of these type II diabetic patients were also given prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs. A total of 400 diabetic patients were randomly selected and 171 entered the study (gender: 94/77 M/F; age: 66.6 ± 8 years; diabetes duration: 12 ± 9 years): 100 patients (group DT) were treated with antihypertensive drugs and 71 (group DU) were untreated. Blood pressure, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and glycated haemoglobin were measured in the two groups. A total of 80% (57/71) of DU patients were hypertensive (BP⩾130/ 85 mmHg). Specifically, 24.4% had diastolic hypertension (BP⩾85 mmHg) and 79% systolic hypertension (BP⩾130 mmHg). Only 63% (100/157) of the hypertensive patients were treated with antihypertensive drugs (two drugs/patient on average, range 1-5). In addition, only 13% of the DT patients were adequately controlled (BP<130/85 mmHg), while the others had above target blood pressure levels (14%: 130-139/85-89 mmHg; 40%: 140-159/90-95 mmHg, and 33%⩾160/ 95 mmHg). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) were included in the antihypertensive medical regimen in 70% of the DT patients (ACE-I: 62%; ARB: 8%; diuretics: 39%; dihydropyridine calcium antagonists: 38%; α-blockers: 20%, β-blockers: 17%; clonidin: 8%; nondihydropyridine calcium antagonists: 5%). Only 33% of type II diabetic patients underwent a screening for microalbuminuria as assessed on clinical records. The same percentage of micro- and macroalbuminuric patients (13.5%) was observed in the DT group, whereas 25% micro vs 3% macro were found in the DU group. In all, 73%... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]