Catalog
LDR | 06780nam 2200853 4500 | ||
001 | 0100801930▲ | ||
005 | 20240322164632▲ | ||
006 | m o d ▲ | ||
007 | cr#unu||||||||▲ | ||
008 | 240116s2022 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d▲ | ||
020 | ▼a9798380272575▲ | ||
035 | ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30593464▲ | ||
035 | ▼a(MiAaPQ)STANFORDrv297kg6406▲ | ||
040 | ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ▲ | ||
082 | 0 | ▼a628▲ | |
100 | 1 | ▼aGaldi, Stephen M.▲ | |
245 | 1 | 0 | ▼aDissolved Methane Management and Post-Treatment for Non-Potable Water Reuse of Staged Anaerobic Fluidized-Bed Membrane Bioreactor Effluent▼h[electronic resource]▲ |
260 | ▼a[S.l.]: ▼bStanford University. ▼c2022▲ | ||
260 | 1 | ▼aAnn Arbor : ▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2022▲ | |
300 | ▼a1 online resource(116 p.)▲ | ||
500 | ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.▲ | ||
500 | ▼aAdvisor: Criddle, Craig;Tarpeh, William;Luthy, Richard.▲ | ||
502 | 1 | ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2022.▲ | |
506 | ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.▲ | ||
520 | ▼aMainstream anaerobic wastewater treatment with the staged anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR) shows promise to transform secondary wastewater treatment into an energy-positive, decentralizable process. However, prior to full scale application, more information is required to address the issues of dissolved methane recovery, compliance with prevailing regulations, and compatibility with polishing unit processes. Dissolved methane in the SAF-MBR effluent comprises between 10-50% of methane generated from secondary treatment, and its recovery is necessary for energy positive operation and prevention of fugitive methane emissions a potent greenhouse gas. Field experiments were conducted at a demonstration-scale SAF-MBR process to evaluate dissolved methane recovery and effluent polishing to reduce trace organic contaminants. Pilot air stripping experiments with regular disinfection demonstrated 98% removal of dissolved methane, with 90% methane recoverable for combustion when blended with primary and secondary biogas streams. Direct energy costs make up less than 1% of the additional energy recoverable from the air stripping process, making the process a robust and efficient option for dissolved methane recovery.In addition to dissolved methane recovery by air stripping, post-treatment consisting of a roughing aerobic filter, tertiary filtration with regenerated activated carbon, and ultraviolet disinfection were shown to manage residual organic matter, pathogens, and trace organics observed in SAF-MBR effluent in compliance with discharge or non-potable reuse regulations. The regenerated activated carbon filtration showed at least two log removal of eight hydrophilic trace organic compounds (TrOCs) spiked at 10-20 µg/L: 1H-benzotriazole, caffeine, carbamazepine, diuron, fipronil, gemfibrozil, imidacloprid, and sulfamethoxazole. With the addition of a nitrogen removal or recovery process, the SAF-MBR effluent could be demonstrated effective and safe for decentralized irrigation applications. The use of regenerated activated carbon and biochar media in tertiary filtration were assessed for additional removal of select TrOCs relevant for indirect potable reuse via groundwater recharge. Using diffusion-limited advection dispersion modeling from pilot tests, TrOC removal and sorption parameters can be onsistently fit to stable wastewater effluent conditions. For TrOCs compatible with sorption removal, multiple log removals were observed over 1500 empty bed volumes of operation with regenerated activated carbon. Under more challenging conditions with 5 wt % activated carbon and 6 wt % biochar, severe filter clogging, and increased TrOC mobility was observed in SAF-MBR effluent without aerobic polishing. Decreases in performance were manifest by a substantial increase in compound specific tortuosity factors, implying kinetic limitations to sorption rather than a large decrease in sorption capacity from high organic carbon loading.These results from testbed studies in field conditions show the feasibility for nonpotable water reuse of SAF-MBR effluent following air stripping for methane recovery, aerobic polishing, regenerated activated carbon filtration, and UV disinfection. Future improvements to SAF-MBR retention and degradation of ultra-fine organic matter are anticipated to further improve the performance of regenerated activated carbon filtration. This is concluded by modeled parameters showing reduced kinetic inhibition of TrOCs loading onto carbon sorbents during operation at lower relative dissolved organic carbon. Increased flow rates may also improve aerobic filter performance, if a trickling filter is selected, as the pilot unit had non-ideal flow distribution over the packing media. Increased aerobic degradation in the effluent prior to black carbon filtration would remove more of the degradable subset of TrOCs, and more importantly further reduce the dissolved organic carbon loading on the sorption media. With these improvements and a nutrient management strategy, the SAF-MBR could be deployed to deliver irrigation water with lower energy and carbon footprints than current alternatives.▲ | ||
590 | ▼aSchool code: 0212.▲ | ||
650 | 4 | ▼aAir flow.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aEnvironmental science.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aWater treatment.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aEmissions.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aElectricity distribution.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aChemical oxygen demand.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aDrinking water.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aBiomass.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aEffluents.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aEnergy consumption.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aActivated carbon.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aTechnology.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aClimate change.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aMembrane separation.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aSludge.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aRecycling.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aElectricity.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aBiogas.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aSensors.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aAlternative energy.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aAnalytical chemistry.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aBiogeochemistry.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aChemistry.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aCivil engineering.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aEnergy.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aEnvironmental engineering.▲ | |
650 | 4 | ▼aSustainability.▲ | |
690 | ▼a0404▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0768▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0363▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0486▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0425▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0485▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0543▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0501▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0791▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0775▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0338▲ | ||
690 | ▼a0640▲ | ||
710 | 2 | 0 | ▼aStanford University.▲ |
773 | 0 | ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-03A.▲ | |
773 | ▼tDissertation Abstract International▲ | ||
790 | ▼a0212▲ | ||
791 | ▼aPh.D.▲ | ||
792 | ▼a2022▲ | ||
793 | ▼aEnglish▲ | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | ▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16934429▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.▲ |
Dissolved Methane Management and Post-Treatment for Non-Potable Water Reuse of Staged Anaerobic Fluidized-Bed Membrane Bioreactor Effluent[electronic resource]
Document Type
국외eBook
Title
Dissolved Methane Management and Post-Treatment for Non-Potable Water Reuse of Staged Anaerobic Fluidized-Bed Membrane Bioreactor Effluent [electronic resource]
Author
Corporate Name
Publication
[S.l.] : Stanford University. 2022 Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses , 2022
Physical Description
1 online resource(116 p.)
General Note
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03, Section: A.
Advisor: Criddle, Craig;Tarpeh, William;Luthy, Richard.
Advisor: Criddle, Craig;Tarpeh, William;Luthy, Richard.
Dissertation Note
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2022.
Summary Note
Mainstream anaerobic wastewater treatment with the staged anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR) shows promise to transform secondary wastewater treatment into an energy-positive, decentralizable process. However, prior to full scale application, more information is required to address the issues of dissolved methane recovery, compliance with prevailing regulations, and compatibility with polishing unit processes. Dissolved methane in the SAF-MBR effluent comprises between 10-50% of methane generated from secondary treatment, and its recovery is necessary for energy positive operation and prevention of fugitive methane emissions a potent greenhouse gas. Field experiments were conducted at a demonstration-scale SAF-MBR process to evaluate dissolved methane recovery and effluent polishing to reduce trace organic contaminants. Pilot air stripping experiments with regular disinfection demonstrated 98% removal of dissolved methane, with 90% methane recoverable for combustion when blended with primary and secondary biogas streams. Direct energy costs make up less than 1% of the additional energy recoverable from the air stripping process, making the process a robust and efficient option for dissolved methane recovery.In addition to dissolved methane recovery by air stripping, post-treatment consisting of a roughing aerobic filter, tertiary filtration with regenerated activated carbon, and ultraviolet disinfection were shown to manage residual organic matter, pathogens, and trace organics observed in SAF-MBR effluent in compliance with discharge or non-potable reuse regulations. The regenerated activated carbon filtration showed at least two log removal of eight hydrophilic trace organic compounds (TrOCs) spiked at 10-20 µg/L: 1H-benzotriazole, caffeine, carbamazepine, diuron, fipronil, gemfibrozil, imidacloprid, and sulfamethoxazole. With the addition of a nitrogen removal or recovery process, the SAF-MBR effluent could be demonstrated effective and safe for decentralized irrigation applications. The use of regenerated activated carbon and biochar media in tertiary filtration were assessed for additional removal of select TrOCs relevant for indirect potable reuse via groundwater recharge. Using diffusion-limited advection dispersion modeling from pilot tests, TrOC removal and sorption parameters can be onsistently fit to stable wastewater effluent conditions. For TrOCs compatible with sorption removal, multiple log removals were observed over 1500 empty bed volumes of operation with regenerated activated carbon. Under more challenging conditions with 5 wt % activated carbon and 6 wt % biochar, severe filter clogging, and increased TrOC mobility was observed in SAF-MBR effluent without aerobic polishing. Decreases in performance were manifest by a substantial increase in compound specific tortuosity factors, implying kinetic limitations to sorption rather than a large decrease in sorption capacity from high organic carbon loading.These results from testbed studies in field conditions show the feasibility for nonpotable water reuse of SAF-MBR effluent following air stripping for methane recovery, aerobic polishing, regenerated activated carbon filtration, and UV disinfection. Future improvements to SAF-MBR retention and degradation of ultra-fine organic matter are anticipated to further improve the performance of regenerated activated carbon filtration. This is concluded by modeled parameters showing reduced kinetic inhibition of TrOCs loading onto carbon sorbents during operation at lower relative dissolved organic carbon. Increased flow rates may also improve aerobic filter performance, if a trickling filter is selected, as the pilot unit had non-ideal flow distribution over the packing media. Increased aerobic degradation in the effluent prior to black carbon filtration would remove more of the degradable subset of TrOCs, and more importantly further reduce the dissolved organic carbon loading on the sorption media. With these improvements and a nutrient management strategy, the SAF-MBR could be deployed to deliver irrigation water with lower energy and carbon footprints than current alternatives.
Subject
Air flow.
Environmental science.
Water treatment.
Emissions.
Electricity distribution.
Chemical oxygen demand.
Drinking water.
Biomass.
Effluents.
Energy consumption.
Activated carbon.
Technology.
Climate change.
Membrane separation.
Sludge.
Recycling.
Electricity.
Biogas.
Sensors.
Alternative energy.
Analytical chemistry.
Biogeochemistry.
Chemistry.
Civil engineering.
Energy.
Environmental engineering.
Sustainability.
Environmental science.
Water treatment.
Emissions.
Electricity distribution.
Chemical oxygen demand.
Drinking water.
Biomass.
Effluents.
Energy consumption.
Activated carbon.
Technology.
Climate change.
Membrane separation.
Sludge.
Recycling.
Electricity.
Biogas.
Sensors.
Alternative energy.
Analytical chemistry.
Biogeochemistry.
Chemistry.
Civil engineering.
Energy.
Environmental engineering.
Sustainability.
ISBN
9798380272575
Related information
Booktalk
Please feel free to read the book
and write your impressions.
글쓰기
and write your impressions.
Call Sign Browsing
Related Popular Books